Advanced Search
Index: Community Development / Subcategory: Housing

Federally Subsidized Housing

Date posted: 06/23/2008

Chart Directory:

The Federal government has funded subsidized housing for low income renters since the Housing Act of 1937. In Larimer County, as in the rest of the country, there is public housing and subsidized housing (generally through a Housing Choice Voucher program). Under these programs, qualified households typically pay 30% of their incomes toward their rent. The Federal government, through a Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) program, pays the rest. To be eligible for programs in Larimer County, people must meet applicable income limits, which vary by household size. Once qualified for a program, a household will generally be put on a waiting list for assistance. The wait for a slot in the program can vary from two years up to four years.

There are five housing authorities in Larimer County:

What this chart shows: Households with Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) in Larimer County, 2003 - 2007

Households with Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) in Larimer County, 2003 - 2007

Data Sources:

See data table

What these data tell us:

The data shown represent the average number of active vouchers for a given year. From 2002 to 2003, the Larimer County Housing Authority (LCHA) nearly tripled the number of vouchers available (from 35 to 100 vouchers) by obtaining an additional HUD grant. 65% of the LCHA vouchers are 'Main Stream Vouchers' designated for use by handicapped households. With the exception of the LCHA, all Housing Choice (Section 8) programs in Larimer County (and across the United States) experienced decreases in the number of vouchers they could manage due to changes in HUD policies and allocations.

The number of vouchers attached to active leases can vary during the year. As households move out of the program and new households are qualified, there can sometimes be unused vouchers during the transition. In 2005, HUD changed the method by which the Housing Choice Voucher Program was funded. Rather than being guaranteed enough money to fund all of their authorized vouchers, housing authorities were given a set amount of money, based on the average amount of money spent during a three month period (May-July) in 2006. If a housing authority happened to be under-leased (not all vouchers in use) during those three months, the amount of money that the housing authority received for 2007 was reduced. In addition to this possible reduction, HUD made an across the board 6% cut in the Housing Choice Voucher Program budget. Nationally, the result of the change since 2005 in federal support has been a net loss of approximately 100,000 housing vouchers. In Larimer County, 52 vouchers were lost.

What this chart shows: Available Public Housing by Housing Authority - Larimer County, 2007

Available Public Housing by Housing Authority - Larimer County, 2007

Data Sources:

Housing Authority of the City of Loveland

See data table

What these data tell us:

Neither the Larimer County Housing Authority nor the Estes Park Housing Authority manages public housing units. In Larimer County, as in the rest of the United States, there are typically a considerably larger number of households with Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) than those living in public housing units (1,298 vouchers compared to 276 units in 2007 for Larimer County). The creation of new public housing units would be extremely costly. With shrinking Federal housing funds, it is more cost effective to use a voucher payment system.

Additional Information:

What is public housing? Public housing is housing owned and run by a governmental body such as a local Housing Authority. To be eligible to live in public housing, a person or family must have low income and meet certain other requirements. Rent and utilities are generally lower than in private housing. In most cases, rent in public housing can be no more than 30% of individual or family gross income.

What is subsidized housing? Housing is subsidized when the government pays part of the tenant's rent or mortgage. To obtain subsidized housing, households must have a low or moderate income. Under the HUD (Housing and Urban Development) Housing Choice Vouchers program and the Rural Economic and Community Development (formerly FmHA) Rental Assistance Program, part of the rent of qualifying lower income households is paid by the government. Under these programs, as with public housing, tenants usually pay no more than 30% of their gross income for rent and utilities.

Housing Choice Vouchers (includes what used to be known as 'Section 8 Certificates') can be project based (e.g., a housing development where some or all units are partially paid by Housing Choice Vouchers) or client based where the voucher moves with the household. In this case, the voucher holder finds a private landlord willing to accept the certificate and work with the program.

There is a difference between 'subsidized housing' and what is referred to as 'affordable housing'. While subsidized housing involves a monetary assistance with paying rent, the term affordable housing is used to describe housing that has been developed or purchased in a manner which allows rental costs or mortgage payments to stay at a lower amount. Therefore, this housing remains affordable (by definition) to households with lower incomes.

On Compass-

Outside Compass -

Data Tables:

Larimer County Section 8 Households, 2002 - 2007

Year

Estes Park

Housing Authority

Fort Collins Housing Authority

Housing Authority of the City of Loveland

Larimer County Housing Authority

2002

44

744

424

35

2003

44

744

424

100

2004

44

744

468

100

2005

40

712

448

100

2006

40

730

430

100

2007

40

728

430

100

See chart

Larimer County Public Housing Units, 2006 - 2007

Year

Fort Collins

Housing Authority

Housing Authority

of the City of Loveland

Wellington

Housing Authority

# of Housing Units

% of Total

# of Housing Units

% of Total

# of Housing Units

% of Total

2006

154

56%

80

29%

42

15%

2007

154

56%

80

29%

42

15%

See chart