MINUTES
Tuesday, November 27, 2007, 5:30-8:30 p.m.
Bison Visitor Center, 1800 SCR 31, Loveland, CO

Present:
|
Linda Knowlton, Chair |
Rob Harris |
|
Ivan Andrade |
Rich Harter |
|
Frank Cada |
Tom Miller |
|
Dave Coulson |
Barry Lewis, Vice Chair |
|
Russell Fruits |
|
|
Gary Buffington |
|
|
Mark Caughlan |
Rob Novak |
|
Dan Rieves |
Marcella Wells |
|
Debra Wykoff |
|
|
|
|
Absent:
|
Chad LaChance |
Kathy Palmeri |
|
|
|
The November 27, 2007, meeting of the Parks Advisory Board was called to order by Linda Knowlton, Chair, at 5:30 p.m. The minutes of the meeting on October 23, 2007, were approved.
PUBLIC COMMENT: Items not on the agenda
GENERAL INFORMATION:
BOARD COMMENT: Items not on the agenda
ACTION ITEMS:
§ Sail & Saddle Club License – Recommendation to Director and Board of Commissioners
Bud McMahon, President, Sail & Saddle Club, responded to comments from the October Board minutes. It is not true that the facility is unsafe. A brand new deck and stairs were installed one year ago. There are also plans to install safety railings. The structure is concrete block with substantial roof timbers. Engineers in the club have evaluated the condition of the concrete as safe. Wiring has been redone within the past 3 years. Overall, the structure is in very good condition for use by a group the size of the Sail & Saddle Club – but not for access by larger numbers of the public if it were to become a public facility. All Club members do purchase County park permits for all boats.
Billy Burt, a member of the Sail & Saddle Club, is responsible for maintenance of the Sail & Saddle facility: He noted that the Club partners with the County in numerous ways: The department has access for use by volunteers, as do other community groups when requested.
Rich Harter made,
and Dave Coulson seconded, a motion to recommend to the Board of County
Commissioners that they approve the license. The motion was approved.
PRESENTATIONS:
The Importance
of Nature for Children – Marcella Wells, former CSU professor and
interpretative consultant
Rob Novak, Interim
Education Coordinator, introduced Marcella Wells, of Wells Resources, Inc., who
taught environmental education at CSU for 10 years. She is now involved with
the Children in Nature Network, a loose collaboration of programs and agencies
interested in this issue, which is presenting this program to groups throughout
the community. Their vision is to develop and promote meaningful relationships
between children and nature.
Marcella is a professional interpretive consultant who works all over the
country and the western hemisphere. Her purpose in this presentation is to
explain the concept of “Last Child in the Woods”. Her presentation focused on
the connection with nature which children develop in youth. What happens if
future generations of decision-makers don’t have those formative outdoor
experiences? Author Richard Louv coined the term “nature-deficit disorder” and
wrote the book, Last Child in the Woods. The term describes the growing
“disconnect” between children and nature. He is not a scientist; he is a
publicist, who noticed the trend. His website is www.cnaturenet.org . Members of the
Board and the public may contact Marcella Wells at marcellawells@comcast.net.
Board comments:
§ How can the Board support this effort? (Marcella said the Board can help spread the awareness; individuals may contribute funding.)
§ Should this be a marketing focus for Larimer County, i.e., “Get Back to Nature – We’ve got the special places for you.” (Marcella recommends use of a tagline; they would love the marketing assistance.)
§ Where is the book available? (Marcella: Online, Barnes & Noble, Amazon)
§ Dr. Bob Kreycik: Serves as a volunteer for the department, and also for the City of Loveland. In the log house up the Poudre Canyon, they have specimens of many animals which kids can touch. Over 1000 kids went there last school year. (Marcella recommends getting a story about it into the newspaper.)
§ Ivan Andrade believes in the emerald necklace philosophy, and hopes that participating on this Board will provide a forum to promote more “paths” from the city to nature. (Marcella stated that such links are a critical charge of this Board.)
§ If future generations don’t have a connection to nature, they won’t support parks and open lands and we will lose our natural constituency. What is the extent of nature deficit disorder here in this area? (Marcella said that answer is unknown, which is why they are hoping to develop a diagnostic tool. Doctors are beginning to become aware and to prescribe unrestricted outdoor play instead of Ritalin.)
§ Look at all the moms waiting in the car for the school bus, in an effort to protect kids from all risk. Inner city kids will not walk on grass – they stay on the asphalt. We perceive our immediate environment as much more dangerous to children, whether it really is or not.
§ What’s the County doing now? How can we help parents get their preschool kids out in nature?
§ During the recreation season, our volunteer naturalists are called on heavily to provide interpretive hikes at our open space areas.
§ Consider designating an area in a park as “Just for Kids.”
§ When we were young, we discovered the outdoors by accident, just by going there and wandering. Our parks and open spaces are the new horizon for city folks who go out wandering. We need to be developing our constituency for 15 years hence. We’re already doing a lot of this.
§ Tom Miller, who states that he is so old he remembers vacant lots where kids like him used to play, suggests that the County should help preserve vacant lots that kids can bike to from their homes.
Staff response:
§ Dan Rieves, Blue Mountain District Manager, cautions that in developing the model to test for the disorder, what we call “recreation” is often not the real thing. Among the RV crowd, kids are sitting in the RV at the campground playing video games. The definition of camping has changed. At Hermit Park, our goal is to offer a true camping experience.
§ Rob Novak, Interim Education Coordinator, explained that we have volunteer naturalists who give guided hikes; we work with Boy Scouts on guided hikes; we provide campground programs, etc., for children and adults.
§ Mark Caughlan, Horsetooth District Manager, noted that we sponsor and assist with a kids’ fishing tournament, Colorado Youth Outdoors, Catch a Special Thrill, and other efforts geared toward kids.
§ Gary Buffington stated that the objective of the Education Strategic Plan is to identify the right niche for our programs to fill.
§ Dan Rieves explained that Colorado Youth Outdoors focuses on the high school years. Kids must have a parent or guardian participate with them. They provide extremely high quality outdoor experiences which would be too expensive for average people to have on their own.
§ Mark Caughlan grew up where there was an “adventure park” – an open lot with a pile of wood that kids could use to build forts, etc.
§
Funding Sources
Overview: Uses & Limitations – Deb Wykoff, Administrative Services
Manager, Lori Smith, Sr. Accountant, and Gary Buffington, Director – 1 hour
Deferred until January
due to long agenda.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
§
Park District
updates – Park District Managers, Mark Caughlan and Dan Rieves – 20 minutes
Horsetooth:
§
Northern Integrated
Supply Project
Mark Caughlan reported
that Glade Reservoir is the proposed dam site for the Northern Integrated
Supply Project. The Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District (NCWCD) has
invited staff to talk about the Glade Reservoir proposed project. The District
will do a presentation at a future meeting.
Board comment:
§ This project will be highly, highly controversial. Our concern about being in on it early is that we will be in the line of fire when the bullets start flying. If we are associated with it in any way, we will be dragged into the negative publicity.
§ Board members from Fort Collins have been following this issue for years. People in Ft. Collins are mainly concerned about the impact on the Poudre River through Ft. Collins. Neither the County nor the City will have any say whatever in whether the project goes through. Although these water rights are very junior, when they do have access to the water, it may significantly affect the river flow through the city.
§ This could become a serious roadblock to public support of a future open space sales tax.
§ The County should remain totally neutral on the merits of the project. If the public perceives that Larimer County is pushing for the project so we can have the recreation area to manage, it will be very negative.
§ Do not develop a plan in advance, or do anything which will make it appear that the County is promoting this project.
§ If there is minimal impact we can have on the process, why get involved at this point? If NCWCD is going to trumpet the cause of recreation, it’s going to place Larimer County right in the middle of the public controversy which could be extremely detrimental to the public image of the department.
§ If the County is a named management partner, the County will have to take a stand on the project; we can’t be wishy-washy. We won’t be able to remain in the background.
§ Have we looked at whether the topography is conducive to recreation? (Mark: Yes – there is a flat area of about 180 acres where the campground would be located.)
§ The environmental opponents of this plan are preparing for battle and raising money. The opposition is well organized.
§ This Board is supposed to hear public input and make a recommendation to the Commissioners based on what is best for our constituents. The “sales pitch” about why or whether it is preferable for Larimer County to manage the recreation comes later.
§ Board members are concerned about NCWCD using the County for their own ends to sell the project.
§ There is one wild and scenic river in all of Colorado: The Poudre River. This project proposes to put a dam on that river. From an emotional standpoint, the public may not know how this project will impact the river, but the ‘blowback’ will be national in scope.
Staff response:
§ NCWCD sees that the recreational opportunities can help sway or pacify the swing vote; so they think it is stronger to say that Larimer County will be their managing partner for recreation.
§ NCWCD is not required to have any public process. The Army Corp of Engineers will conduct the public hearing, which will be very cut and dried, and then they will move on with the project.
§
Director Gary
Buffington stated that he hears and understands that the Board is counseling
the County to proceed with caution, very slowly. He noted that he has also
heard that Senators Salazar and Allard are on board with the project.
§
GOCO grant to fund
Parks Master Plan Priority 1 projects at Horsetooth
A GOCO award in the amount of $695,000 is imminent and will enable the
department to complete all Priority 1 projects from the Master Plan within 5
years. Mark reviewed various projects which could be done as a result. Awards
will be made the first week of December.
§
Horsetooth Mountain
Park Forest Management
$170,000 in forestry
management funds have been secured for 2008. Funding will be used to address beetle
kill, fire breaks, mistletoe, etc. Timber thinning may be a source for wood
chips as a by-product, which would help us get other grants.
Board comment:
§ What’s our exposure to pine beetle? (Per Gary, it has reached Cameron Pass; risk is high.)
§ What’s the probability of effective prophylactic measures? (Low)
§ There is a request for a future agenda item to discuss safety pruning of large trees like the cottonwood trees at Glade Park to avoid future loss and or liability from “widow makers” if they fall. (Per Dan, Dave Lentz, County Forester, works on this.)
§
How much work is there
to be done? (easily 10 years)
§ Staffing: Two new rangers: Dean Martenson and Joe Koch.
Blue Mountain District:
§
There was a suicide at
South Shore two
weeks ago. This was the first fatality in almost a year (following seven
deaths the previous year.)
§
Forest Management at Carter Lake
Today was the last day of
a forest health project on the west side of Carter, which demonstrates a
textbook beautiful result. The canopy has been opened up. Slash piles will be
burned during the next snowfall. We have been awarded more funds in the next
grant cycle. Meegan Flenniken and Tony Simons with Emergency Services are very
effective in getting the funding.
§
Event Management
Gary, Mark, Dan and parks
staff met with staff of The Ranch, (which is also in the Public Works Division,
as are we) to discuss event management. The meeting was very productive.
Chris Fleming, Hermit Park Manager, has met with their event planner to learn
how to handle the planning of large events.
§
Marketing Committee
The department marketing committee met with Rich Harter, and was encouraged to
find out we are doing some things right. The primary components of the
marketing effort are a) to keep the department in the public eye; b) to adapt
to effective marketing techniques; and c) to focus on low visitation windows such
as shoulder season recreation.
§
Permit System
Redesign Project
A core team is looking at options available through our current campground
reservation company, Reserve World, to revolutionize our permit structure by
2009.
§
Hermit Park:
The final draft of designs for recreation facilities was ready today, and will
be reviewed by the entity which holds the conservation easement. We are
currently focusing on what will be done for the “opening” in 2008 – only
certain components will be ready by that time. For example, the turn lanes
from the highway won’t be completed by then, so there may be restrictions on
the volume of public access at the time of opening. Do we open everything and
then close areas as we are ready to work on them, or only open areas that are
ready to go? The progress of the permitting process for many elements will
determine how that looks.
§
Carter Lake Marina:
The plan is to break ground by December 17. The scope of the building has
evolved, based on septic, sewer, and other issues. For example, there will be
a food service operation, instead of a restaurant. The existing marina will be
demolished by the first week of January, before construction of the new
building begins. The maintenance facility and caretaker’s apartment will be in
a separate building onsite. The new entry road will require removal of 100
trees. Tree cutting starts tomorrow. Trees are being made available to
neighbors for firewood; stumps will go into the reservoir for fish habitat.
STANDING AGENDA ITEMS:
§
Parks Master Plan
Implementation – Progress report. See above, under Park District reports.
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
§
Parks Advisory
Board Holiday Party
The Open Lands Advisory
Board traditionally has a holiday party at the home of a Board member. The
Department pays for the catering (not the alcohol).
Agreed: Reserve the County suite for an Eagles game in January or
February. The department will pay for tickets and food.
§ 2008 Meeting Schedule
§
Open Lands staff
members have requested that the Board consider moving the PAB meetings to the
first half of the month to avoid meeting in the same week and/or within a few
days of the Open Lands Advisory Board.
Agreed: PAB meetings will be moved to the second Tuesday of every
month. There will be no meeting in December. Deb will reschedule meeting
rooms and send out a list of meeting dates for 2008.
DIRECTOR’S REPORT:
§ Monthly update to the Board
§
Big Thompson
Property sales:
Director Gary Buffington presented a brief history of the Big Thompson properties.
The 153 parcels acquired by Larimer County in the
aftermath of the 1976 Big Thompson Flood total 83 acres. Four of the larger
parcels were made into public parks, which were closed in 2000 due to financial
issues. Two of the areas were managed by Estes Valley Recreation & Park
District for several years. The two closed areas were re-opened in 2004; and
in 2006, all four parks were returned to County management. The current
operations budget is $26,000, funded by General Fund.
Approximately 60 parcels not appropriate for public use or river access will be
offered for sale to the public over time, under a plan approved by the Board of
Commissioners. To date, 3 parcels have been sold to adjoining landowners.
These are located in a subdivision, inaccessible to the public. One is a parcel
which was the subject of an encroachment dispute between adjoining landowners.
The prices averaged about $6500 per parcel.
None of the sold parcels are among the 11 that the Loveland Fishing Club
identified as appropriate for fishing access and fishable water. Those 11
include the four park areas already open to the public, plus seven additional
parcels. Fees will not be charged at any of the public access areas. However,
maintenance will cost the county; there must be a revenue source to fund this.
Currently operation of these parks is covered by General Fund.
Many of these parcels are so small that the cost of having them surveyed cannot
be justified. In Colorado, public access is limited to the river
area adjacent to the public shore – the public cannot fish up or downstream
from that site.
Board comment:
§ Are we sacrificing potential fishing sites by selling off any of these 60 parcels? All sites appropriate for public access should be identified before any parcels are sold.
§ If there is no public access to the parcel without trespassing on private property, the parcel is not appropriate for fishing access.
§ Can we give the public 60 days to comment on the parcels proposed for sale, to eliminate public concerns about it? Put the burden on the public to come and comment.
§ The Loveland Fishing Club recommendations should be validated by staff inspection as appropriate for fishing access.
§ Would the fishing community be satisfied if there is assurance that those 11 parcels will be preserved for public fishing access?
§ Could parcels be sold subject to conservation easements?
§ Conservation Easements will only cause legal and management nightmares in the future. Anything that is suitable for fishing access will not be released by the County anyway.
§ Tom Miller asked for this topic to be scheduled for discussion to defuse public reaction when they hear that parcels have been sold. The public needs to be aware of the process which has occurred to identify and save parcels appropriate for public access.
Public comment:
§
Dallas Maurer, president of the Alpine Anglers Trout
Unlimited Chapter in Estes Park: As a resident of the Big Thompson Canyon, he is
concerned that adjoining property owners are not being consulted. He is also
concerned that the fishermen who spoke earlier at this meeting, and volunteered
to take care of the areas, have never participated in any of the river cleanups
the community has sponsored. The residents have no objection to fishermen
accessing the river anywhere – but they do object to increasing traffic and
vehicle parking. They object to general public access by people who trash the
area, leaving diapers and cigarette butts strewn about, etc. Most fishermen
are really good about being respectful and unobtrusive.
Staff response:
§
Dan Rieves: Fishing access is available all along
the river. The department is already talking to the adjoining owners in the
area of those parcels which are being considered for disposal. He has not seen
the eleven parcels identified by the Loveland Fishing Club. He would like to
see them, as well as the rest of the parcels, before it is determined that only
those 11 parcels are appropriate for public fishing access.
Chair Linda Knowlton proposed that a committee of fishermen on the Board meet with Gary and Dan to review the parcels identified for public fishing access.
A motion was made by Dave Coulson as follows:
a) To move forward with the process approved by the County Commissioners to evaluate and dispose of certain parcels in the Big Thompson Canyon;
b) provided that staff and board members will look at the eleven properties identified by the Loveland Fishing Club, to confirm that these parcels are appropriate to be retained by Larimer County for public fishing access; and
c) further provided that the remainder of the sixty parcels to be sold will be put up for public comment for 60 days prior to being offered for sale; and except that
d) those parcels for which sales are currently under negotiation will be brought to the Board individually for approval and public review through the PAB public comment process, and will not be required to go through a 60 day waiting period prior to conclusion of the sale.
Rob Harris seconded the motion, provided it is amended to require that the evaluation and disposal process be put into written format describing how properties will be identified and put up for sale.
Discussion:
§ Fishing is an important family activity. It is important to protect pubic access to the river.
§ An interested group (Loveland Fishing Club) has already surveyed the areas and identified 11 sites. It seems unnecessary to repeat that process with other interested parties.
§ Right now we are dealing with parcels involving specific property issues.
§ Does the motion as stated allow staff a process that is sufficiently uncluttered to continue making good progress?
The motion was approved as amended.
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
§ No meeting in December
§ January 8, 2008: Funding Sources Overview: Uses & Limitations – Deb Wykoff, Administrative Services Manager, Lori Smith, Sr. Accountant, and Gary Buffington, Director – 1 hour
§ February 12, 2008: 2008 Parks Capital Improvement Projects Budget Overview –Deb Wykoff, Administrative Services Manager – 1 hour
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra Wykoff
Approved: ____________________________ ______________________
Chair, Parks Advisory Board (Date)
Next regular meeting: January 8,, 2007, at the Boyd Lake Room, Larimer County Courthouse Office Building