PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1998
The Board of County Commissioners met at 3:00 p.m. in regular
session with Rob Helmick, Senior Planner. Chair Olson presided
and Commissioners Clarke and Disney were present. Also present
were: Carol Evans and Matt Lafferty, Planners II; John Pedas,
Code Enforcement Officer; Lonnie Sheldon, Project Engineer; Doug
Ryan, Environmental Health Planner; and Jeannine Haag, Assistant
County Attorney. Recording Clerk, Sherry Graves.
Chair Olson stated that the following are consent items and will
not be discussed in detail unless requested by the Commissioners
or members of the audience.
1. AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS 27 & 28 OF THE ROSTEK 2ND ADDITION
SUBDIVISION (#98-SA1222): 09-07-69 - SOUTH SIDE OF WEST VINE
DRIVE, ¼ MILE EAST OF OVERLAND TRAIL; 2 ACRES; 2 LOTS;
FA-FARMING ZONING
This is a request for an Amended Plat to adjust the lot line between
Lots 27 & 28 of the Rostek 2nd Addition Subdivision.
Staff findings include: 1) The proposed amended plat is in compliance
with the Larimer County Master Plan, the Larimer County Zoning
Resolution, and the Larimer County Subdivision Resolution; 2)
The amended plat is compatible with other development in the surrounding
area; 3) Approval of the amended plat will not result in any significant
impacts to neighboring properties, the natural environment, or
the provision of services and infrastructure; 4) Property values
in the surrounding area would not be adversely affected by the
amended plat. The staff recommendation is for approval of the
Amended Plat of Lots 27 & 28 of the Rostek 2nd
Addition Subdivision, subject to the following conditions: 1)
The applicant shall install a concrete apron from Vine Street
to the access road on the property; said apron shall be constructed
to the specifications of the Engineering Department requirements;
2) The applicant shall widen the access easement from 12 to 20
feet, and note the easement as access and utility easement.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
adopt the staff findings and staff recommendation and approve
the Amended Plat of Lots 27 & 28 of the Rostek 2nd
Addition Subdivision (#98-SA1222) and the Southland Corporation
Planned Unit Development (#98-MS1204), with the conditions as
outlined.
Motion carried 3-0.
Bud Anderson requested an opportunity to discuss the Southland
Corporation PUD; therefore, the Board took the following action.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
vacate the decision made by the above motion and move to approve
only the first item on the consent agenda, the Amended Plat of
Lots 27 & 28 of the Rostek 2nd Addition Subdivision
(#98-SA1222), with conditions as outlined.
Motion carried 3-0.
2. SOUTHLAND CORPORATION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(#98-MS1204): 13-06-69 - SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRILBY ROAD
AND HIGHWAY 287; 2 ACRES; C-COMMERCIAL ZONING
This is a request for a Preliminary Plat for a Planned Unit Development
to divide a 2-acre lot into 2 lots for commercial use; a 7-11
store exists on Parcel 2. Staff findings are: 1) The use is
compatible with the surrounding area. The uses along South College
are commercial in nature, as this use, and the proposed uses are
consistent with the area; 2) The addition of one commercial lot
limited to neighborhood retail uses in this location is consistent
with the adopted Master Plan and City Plan; 3) The requested use
conforms to the comments of all responding agencies; 4) The request
meets the technical requirements of the regulations; 5) The impact
on services and facilities of the uses of this site were reviewed
at the time of the building permit for the 7-11; they were oversized
and designed to mitigate any impacts; 6) A traffic study and follow
up were conducted at the time of the building permit on Lot 1;
the proposed uses of Lot 2 are lower than that originally studied.
The improvements constructed address the impact of this use;
7) The drainage on this site will meet the stormwater requirements
and drainage standards for the UGA; 8) The use is consistent with
surrounding land uses; the residential areas to the east are not
connected and will be screened and buffered.
The Urban Growth Area Review Board/Staff recommendation is for
approval of the Southland Corporation PUD, with the following
conditions: 1) Any building permit for Lot 2 shall be required
to pay the then current drainage fee; 2) The development of Lot
2 shall comply with the landscaping and parking standards contained
in Appendix F of the IGA; 3) The traffic study originally completed
for the 7-11 shall be updated by letter from the original author
to reflect the conclusions regarding the possible uses and intensity
of use on the future Lot 2. Any building permit application
and site plan shall require confirmation of the original traffic
analysis; 4) The applicant shall continue discussions regarding
the additional dedication of ROW along Trilby Road. Conflicts
with existing on site improvements shall be avoided; 5) The site
plan for Lot 2 shall incorporate the recommendations of the City
of Fort Collins regarding bike parking and Foxtrot stops; 6) The
applicant shall provide for erosion control at the detention pond
and maintain culverts as identified in the letter from the Colorado
Geological Survey in their letter dated July 24, 1998; 7) Any
development of Lot 2 shall be subject to a review of the site
plan and use(s) by the County staff prior to issuance of a building
permit; 8) The approval of this subdivision/PUD is limited to
the uses and plans as represented by the applicant unless modified
by these conditions.
Mr. Anderson, who owns a four-plex adjacent to the subject property,
expressed concern about the car wash and proper drainage and he
asked several questions: 1) What the noise level will be? 2) Hours
of operation? 3) What actions will be taken with regard to drainage
from the car wash at the 7-11 to protect the people? Mr. Helmick
responded that these concerns will be dealt with as a "use
by right" as an accessory use to the gas station on this
site; he noted that at this time he has no information regarding
the hours, noise level, or issues of drainage and sanitation.
Mr. Helmick stated that the question before the Board today is
a request to divide off a ¾ acre lot, which will share access
to the site with Lot 1. Chair Olson advised Mr. Anderson to discuss
his questions with Mr. Nation.
Paul Nation, representative for the applicant Galloway/Romero
& Associates, stated that he will get the information to Mr.
Anderson regarding noise levels, hours of operation, drainage,
etc.; he noted that the cars will come in from the east and exit
to the west and so the blow dryers associated with the car wash
are not located on the side abuting the residences to the east
and in terms of drainage, everything is tied in to the sewage
system and so there is no surface flow and it has been approved
by the Sanitation District. Mr. Anderson asked what protection
does he have if noise levels are excessive; he was advised by
the Board that the County has a noise ordinance. Mr. Ryan suggested
that Mr. Anderson let the South Fort Collins District and Southland
Corporation know of his concerns and existing drainage problems.
Commissioner Disney asked if any of the conditions need to be
amended to address these drainage concerns; Mr. Helmick responded
that what is needed is certification from the South Fort Collins
Water and Sanitation District that they approved the utility plans
for Lot 2 and the County will also work with them on this issue.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
adopt the staff findings and Urban Growth Area Review Board/Staff
recommendation and approve the Southland Corporation Planned Unit
Development (#98-MS1204), with the conditions as outlined.
Motion carried 3-0.
3. BONNELL WEST PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 5TH FILING
(#98-MS1189): NW 31-05-69 - WEST OF COUNTY ROAD 23, ½ MILE
NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 14, SOUTHWEST OF LON HAGLER
RESERVOIR; 61.8 ACRES; FA-1 FARMING ZONING
This is a request for Preliminary Phase Plan to subdivide 61.8
acres, creating 23 single family residential lots on 27.8 acres
with 34 acres of open space; this is the final filing of Bonnell
West PUD. Ms. Evans described the location of this development
and noted that the developer would like to discuss with the Board
the County's policy regarding maintenance of subdivision streets;
she noted that the streets in the First Filing of Bonnell West
are maintained by the County, but, because of budget constraints,
the policy regarding street maintenance by the County has now
changed and the County no longer accepts subdivision streets for
maintenance. Staff findings include: 1) The Bonnell West PUD
Master Plan was originally approved in 1982 and revised in 1992.
Issues of location, use and density were addressed at those
times, leaving technical issues to be addressed with Preliminary
Phase Plan reviews. The revised Bonnell West Master Plan expired
in June 1997 and was reinstated by the Board of County Commissioners
on June 1, 1998. The proposed 5th Filing is consistent
with the approved Bonnell West Master Plan; 2) Larimer County
adopted a new County Master Plan in November of 1997. This applicant
has addressed County Master Plan issues to the extent possible
given that the Bonnell West development has been in the process
for 16 years and is at the point of developing the final phase;
3) With certain conditions, approval of the Preliminary Phase
Plan for the Bonnell West PUD 5th Filing will promote
harmonious development of the area by allowing completion of the
final phase of this PUD, will provide for coordinated development
with the property to the south, and will not result in any significant
negative impacts on neighboring properties, the natural environment,
or the provision of services and transportation.
The Planning Commission/Staff recommendation is for approval of
the Preliminary Phase Plan for Bonnell West PUD 5th
Filing, with the following conditions: 1) The Final Plat shall
be completed in strict conformance with the conditionally approved
Preliminary Plat, including all notes. Easements, as shown on
the Preliminary Plat and as required by the utility companies,
shall be provided on the Final Plat; 2) The following notes shall
be included on the Final Plat: a) Streets in this filing shall
not be maintained by Larimer County. Maintenance of the streets
shall be the responsibility of the property owners. Failure to
maintain these facilities may result in a lien being placed on
these lots; b) Passive radon mitigation measures shall be included
in construction of residential structures on these lots. The
results of a radon detection test conducted in new dwellings once
the structure is enclosed, but prior to issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy, shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
As an alternative, a builder may present a prepaid receipt from
a radon tester which specifies that a test will be done within
30 days. A permanent Certificate of Occupancy can be issued when
the prepaid receipt is submitted; c) Engineered footing and foundation
plans shall be required for all construction on these lots. Each
house site shall have a soils investigation performed to verify
the soils beneath the proposed house. Excavation and bore hole
assessments for each lot shall be conducted by a professional
engineer, using the Geotechnical and Geological Investigation
report for Bonnell West 5th Filing (CDS project #98-9385)
for guidance. Property owners should refer to Appendix 1 of
that report, titled "Post-construction Site Preparation and
Maintenance" for information regarding landscaping and irrigation
near foundations; d) The following fees shall be collected at
building permit issuance for new single family dwellings: Larimer
County Park fees, Thompson R2-J school fees, and any applicable
impact fees required by Larimer County at the time of building
permit application. Unless otherwise specified, the fee current
at time of building permit application shall apply; e) Underground
utilities shall be required; f) Building envelopes are included
on Lots 21, 22 and 23 to protect areas of those lots where imperiled
plant habitat is located. All construction activities on these
lots must be within the platted building envelopes; g) Fire resistive
construction materials should be used for structures on Lots 21-23
and any cantilever decks should be enclosed by retaining walls
or sheathing backed with 1/8 inch metal screening. For structures
on Lots 3-7, which propose cantilever decks facing west, decks
should be constructed with fire resistive materials and have non-flammable
landscaping underneath them (i.e. rock). Landscaping in the
5th Filing should be completed with fire safety in
mind. Conifer trees should be located a minimum of 12' away from
structures and decks. Bushes or shrubs should not be placed under
large windows or decks; h) There is a potential for build-up of
alkali deposits as a result of lawn watering along the western
side of Lots 1-8. Installation of irrigated lawns in this area
should be restricted; use of low water plants/grasses and native
vegetation is encouraged; i) Thompson R2-J school bus pickup point
for all grade levels will be at County Road 23 and Jordan Drive;
j) Rural area issues: ii) Lot owners should be advised that there
is a potential for nuisance conflicts from wildlife (such as skunks,
raccoons, prairie dogs and snakes). Lot owners should be prepared
to address wildlife conflicts if they arise. The Colorado Division
of Wildlife may be contacted for information on preventative measures
to avoid conflicts with wildlife; iii) During certain times of
the year, mosquitoes may present a significant nuisance. Larimer
County does not have a mosquito abatement program. Any mosquito
abatement activity will be the responsibility of the homeowner;
such activity must be according to applicable Federal, State and
local rules and regulations; iiii) Prairie dog colonies exist
in the general area; prairie dogs can be a nuisance if they migrate
to developed residential property. At times these animals are
implicated in the transmission of plague to people or their pets.
It is important for residents to observe animal control requirements
for dogs and cats; iiiii) Farming practices on adjacent properties
can produce odors, noise and dust. These are a normal part of
agriculture and should be expected to occur; k) A portion of Outlet
A has been identified as habitat for a globally imperiled plant.
No construction is allowed in the habitat area and recreational
use is discouraged. A future interpretive trail for education
and use of residents in Bonnell West may be allowed in this area.
Any plans for such a trail must be reviewed and approved by the
Larimer County Parks Department; 3) Final plat requirements for
construction and utility plans, final drainage plans and erosion
control reports shall be met by the developer. In addition to
standard requirements, a revised Preliminary Drainage Plan and
report which addresses the comments from County Engineering shall
be submitted (2 copies). The final drainage report and erosion
control report shall be prepared according to the specific requirements
contained in the Engineering Department's comments and as contained
in the Larimer County Stormwater Management Manual and shall also
address specific concerns noted by the Colorado Geological Survey
regarding headward-eroding gullies on the site. All plans must
be approved prior to recording of the Final Plat; 4) All improvements
for this development shall be included in a Subdivision Improvements
Agreement (SIA) which shall be secured by appropriate collateral
of a type and amount approved by the County Commissioners. Improvements
shall include roads, drainage facilities, street signs, utility
extensions, and fire hydrants. The SIA, along with cost estimates
and collateral, shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
These documents must be approved prior to recording the Final
Plat; 5) The developer shall be responsible for installation of
traffic signs in the subdivision concurrent with road construction
in the 5th Filing as proposed: a) Four-way stop at
Jordan Drive/Wild Plum Drive intersection; b) Single stop at Jordan
Drive at Kyle Circle (T-intersection): c) Single stop at Wild
Plum Drive at Kyle Circle (T-intersection); d) Single stop at
Kyle Circle at Jordan Drive (T-intersection); 6) The Final Plat
for Bonnell West 5th Filing shall provide an emergency
access and utility easement from the south end of the cul-de-sac
off of Kyle Circle to the Petersburg property on the south.
The easement shall be 40' in width to allow installation of underground
utilities and the construction of an emergency access road.
If the Petersburg RLUP project proceeds ahead of the Bonnell West
5th Filing, a separate grant of easement document may
be required; 7) A copy of the completed Boundary Line Adjustment
between the properties owned by Petersburg and Libco, Inc. shall
be submitted prior to recording the Final Plat for Bonnell West
5th Filing. The Final Plat for Bonnell West 5th
Filing shall not include that portion deeded to Petersburg as
part of the Boundary Line Adjustment. A copy of the lease or
agreement between the developers regarding the use of that portion
of the property by the Bonnell West Homeowners Association shall
also be submitted; 8) The portion of Outlot A and of Lots 21-23
that have been identified by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program
as habitat for Bell's Twinpod shall be designated on the Final
Plat; 9) The developer shall be responsible for meeting the requirements
of the Little Thompson Water District regarding payment of impact
fees, the developer's responsibility for improvements, water shares,
fees for fire hydrants, and installation of improvements to provide
water flow and pressure adequate for domestic service and fire
protection requirements. Installation of the 8" water line
from County Road 12 to this development and installation, inspection
and approval of fire hydrants in the development shall be completed
prior to issuance of building permits; 10) The Final Plat application
materials shall include written acknowledgment from the Handy
Ditch Company that they have reviewed and approved the drainage
plan for this development.
Jim Crowder, developer of Bonnell West and elected officer of
the homeowners association, stated that they have not asked the
County to take over street maintenance for the 2nd,
3rd & 4th Filings; however, the arguments
for the County taking over street maintenance in these filings
and in the 5th Filing are: 1) The rules and regulations
and policies that were in effect at the time of the original Master
Plan should prevail; 2) These roads do more than just serve the
interests of the homeowners in the 5th Filing, as previously,
he was requested by the County to take a portion of their open
land to provide emergency access to the developer to the south
so he wouldn't have to build a mile of road and put in two bridges;
3) General consistency of a subdivision falling under the same
rules; 4) The people in the subdivision have expected that the
County to do this; 5) The fact that the developer has made an
extraordinary contribution in the way of off site work for this
subdivision to the benefit of many people in the County, as it
services the Lon Hagler Recreation Area and Lone Tree; 6) It is
the right thing to do.
Questions from the Board and discussion followed; Commissioner
Clarke asked Ms. Haag what commitment does the County have to
a Master Plan that was approved under one policy and then that
policy changed? Ms. Haag responded that the County doesn't have
a commitment, unless there is a vested right under the Master
Plan. Commissioner Disney asked Mr. Sheldon if he has a cost
estimate for maintaining the roads in the 5th Filing;
Mr. Sheldon stated that he discussed this issue with the Director
of Public Works, Marc Engemoen, and their optimum choice would
be to not maintain any subdivision roads in the County. Mr.
Crowder stated that the lots are selling between $120,000 and
$129,000 and will be generating a lot of taxes. The Board expressed
their understanding of Mr. Crowder's frustration, but budget constraints
prevent them from approving the request.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
adopt the staff findings and Planning Commission/Staff recommendation
and approve the Preliminary Phase Plan for Bonnell West Planned
Unit Development 5th Filing, with the conditions as
outlined.
Motion carried 3-0.
At this time Chair Olson left the meeting.
4. WETZLER JUNKYARD ZONING VIOLATION (#98-ZV1250): SE ¼
35-04-69 - 3 MILES SOUTH OF BERTHOUD
This alleged violation is for storing building materials, pipe,
boilers, junk and other debris in the FA-1 Farming Zoning District.
Mr. Pedas submitted photos of the site, provided the background
information regarding this alleged violation, and reviewed the
major issues and concerns; he noted that the building materials
on site were to be used for construction of a dwelling and barn
on the property immediately south of the subject property in Boulder
County but there was a problem with the storage of the materials
in Boulder County until such time permits were issued for construction.
Staff findings are: 1) The subject property is zoned FA-1 Farming;
2) The FA-1 Farming Zone does not permit outside storage not accessory
to a permitted use or principal use of the property; 3) The outside
storage of junk and other debris results in a significant negative
visual impact in an otherwise rural/residential neighborhood;
4) The strict application of the zoning regulations does not deny
the property owner of a reasonable use of the property; 5) Continued
use of the property inconsistent with the zoning restriction will
significantly affect property values in the neighborhood. The
staff recommendation is to find that a violation exists, require
compliance within 30 days, and authorize legal action if the deadline
is not met.
Mr. Pedas submitted an addendum to the staff report which indicated
that the property owner has submitted a CTR for subdividing the
subject property and applied for a building permit for a 10,080
sq. ft. "barn" with living quarters; however, applications
for subdivisions clearly state "Building permits cannot be
issued while this application is pending". The property
owner has submitted a letter requesting that the permit be issued
because it will be on one of the lots in the proposed subdivision
and the barn could be used to store some of the "junk",
which is the issue of the zoning violation. The staff recommendation
of this request is that the Board support the Staff's decision
not to issue the building permit. Mr. Pedas noted that the Boulder
County Board of Commissioners will be holding their hearing on
October 21, 1998 on the site plan.
Earl Connor, Project Manager, stated that they have been working
hard to comply with the requests made by Mr. Pedas and they have
hauled off all the rubbish and the site has been improved substantially.
Mr. Pedas stated he will need to do another field inspection
to see what has been removed; he submitted pictures of the site,
which he took last Thursday, indicating that there was still a
lot of material there at that time.
Willis Wetzler, property owner, stated that if he had any idea
this would have caused this much trouble, he never would have
moved anything onto the property and he hopes the property is
cleaned up enough now to give them time to use the materials.
Stacey Wetlzer stated that they do not want an eyesore on any
of their properties and want to be good neighbors and they plan
to build a nice home on this property. Carrie Buehler, adjacent
property owner, stated that her family has owned their property
of 280 acres since 1940 and she is very concerned; she asked about
the ag use, as the equipment on the site looks like commercial
equipment not farm equipment, the weeds haven't been mowed, and
nothing has been planted. Mr. Wetzler responded that they have
tilled 155 acres and something will be planted. Questions from
the Board and discussion followed.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
find, in the matter of the Wetzler Junkyard Zoning Violation,
that a violation exists, require compliance within 30 days, and
authorize legal action if the deadline is not met.
Motion carried 2-0.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
support the staff recommendation not to issue the building permit
until after the CTR review.
Motion carried 2 - 0.
The meeting recessed at 4:30 p.m.
The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 7:00 p.m. in regular
session with Rob Helmick, Senior Planner. Chair Olson presided
and Commissioners Clarke and Disney were present. Also present
were: Lonnie Sheldon, Project Engineer, Doug Ryan, Environmental
Health Planner; and Jeannine Haag, Assistant County Attorney.
Recording Clerk, Sherry Graves.
1. MONROE EXCAVATION SPECIAL REVIEW (#98-ZR1202): 33-10-73
23500 COUNTY ROAD 74E IN RED FEATHER LAKES; 1.99 ACRES;
O-OPEN ZONING
This is a request for Special Review for heavy equipment storage
and maintenance in the O-Open Zoning District. Mr. Helmick provided
the background information regarding this request and reviewed
the major issues and concerns; he noted that the property is currently
being used for storage and maintenance of heavy equipment and
had been used for this purpose as well as a sawmill since the
1950's. Mr. Helmick stated that earlier this year, as the result
of complaints from neighbors, the County Commissioners reviewed
this property and determined that the prior non-conforming use
had been abandoned and found a violation existed; at that time,
the applicant indicted that he would pursue a Special Review application
to resolve the violation. Staff findings include: 1) The proposal
is consistent with the Master Plan. The reintroduction of this
use in the Red Feather Lakes area is consistent with the historic
use of the property, is a use allowed in the zoning district,
and provides a necessary service to the area; 2) The proposed
use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning resolution;
providing this service to the Red Feather Lakes area reduces the
congestion of the roads, provides a convenience of service to
the area, and with certain conditions, can operate safely and
without impacting the air quality of the area; 3) With conditions
on the operation and site improvements, the use is harmonious
with the surrounding area. The reestablishment of this use at
this location will not adversely impact the area; 4) With the
proposed conditions, the use will not have an adverse effect on
the neighborhood or the property values of the area; 5) No governmental
agency has indicated a conflict with the proposal, under certain
conditions.
Mr. Helmick stated that the applicant has requested two accesses
to the property and the Planning Commission suggested that a waiver
to Section 3 allowing two accesses could be allowed contingent
upon showing the Board that excessive site clearing would be necessary
to utilize only one point of access; he submitted a drawing by
the applicant which indicates the approximate area that would
need to be cleared on the site if one access was used to accommodate
the turn around of 18-wheel flatbed trailers. Mr. Sheldon stated
that CR 74E is a minor arterial and the concern of the Engineering
Department is to limit the number of access points on a heavily
used road and the policy states that only one access per property
on a minor arterial; he submitted an enlarged copy of the applicant's
drawing. Questions from the Board and much discussion followed
regarding several of the conditions and the question whether to
allow one or two accesses to the property. Mr. Sheldon stated
that there is a possibility to share the driveway on the lower
end of the property and he suggested that the applicant could
enter into an agreement with Mr. Kaas, the adjacent property owner,
for a second access.
Richard Boge, attorney for the applicant, requested clarification
regarding several of the conditions and asked if another condition
regarding allowing short-term loading and unloading of large equipment,
not in the ROW, but on the front part of Mr. Monroe's property
could be allowed. Mr. Helmick stated that if the front part
of the property could be reclaimed and substantially screened
from public view, it could be a quick-drop spot and he thinks
they can work with Mr. Monroe to meet the intent of conditions
#2 and #4. Mr. Helmick submitted photos of the site taken by
the Wildfire Coordinator focusing on the tree density and from
the zoning violation file taken in the winter time focusing on
the roadway frontage.
At this time the public comment portion of the hearing was opened
and the following persons spoke in support of Mr. Monroe and his
request for approval of this Special Review: Gene Barker, Al Sagert,
Jerry Ryan, Patty McMillan, Beverly Blat, Alan Klenk, and Randy
Boyd. Mr. Barker stated that he owned this property previously
and had equipment on it since 1950; he noted that he heard there
was going to be fence erected along the road to screen the area,
which he is totally against. With regard to cutting the trees
down, he stated that it would be a crime to cut them down as they
are Ponderosa pine and they grow very slowly. Mr. Barker stated
that it would be totally convenient for Mr. Monroe to be able
to come in the east driveway and unload his equipment and exit
to the west. Mr. Sagert stated that two accesses would be better
than one because in order to turn the big trucks around in this
area would twist the axels. Mr. Ryan stated that hindering this
operation will affect all the taxpayers in the area. Ms. McMillan,
stated that Monroe Excavating has the equipment, insurance and
knowledge to keep the roads in Red Feather passable and in repair
throughout the year and his response is timely and economical,
due in part to the location of his equipment; she continued that
the Monroe family is an integral part of the community. Marian
Monroe explained his drawings for the Board; he stated that he
is willing to share a common driveway with his neighbor, Mr. Kaas.
Mr. Monroe noted that there are bolders in the front of the
property which would provide natural screening. Ms. Blat, full-time
resident in Red Feather, stated that when Red Feather had 41"
of snow last year, Mr. Monroe was the most important person in
their life at that time and they are very happy to have him around.
Mr. Ryan agreed with Ms. Blat. Mr. Klenk stated that he is
concerned about safety and he suggested putting up "Private
Property" and "No Turn Around" signs to keep the
general public from using the accesses as a turn around. Mr.
Boyd, resident of Red Feather since 1968, stated that he has seen
equipment in and out of this property all his life and it never
bothered him and it is very convenient to have the equipment so
close. Mr. Barker spoke again and said that Mr. Monore is a
responsible person and the only one of the local contractors that
would perform with insurance and they have a continuing contract
with him to do their roads.
Questions from the Board and discussion followed; Commissioner
Clarke stated that he is convinced that in order to allow the
applicant to bring equipment in, drop it off, etc., it would be
wise to have a 2nd access on the west end. Commissioner
Disney asked about adequate line of site distance at the access
points; condition #5 was amended to take this into consideration.
Chair Olson asked Mr. Monroe if he is certain he can reach an
agreement with Mr. Kaas about sharing a driveway on the east end
of the property; Mr. Monroe responded that basically he is sharing
it with him now and doesn't feel this will be a problem.
After much discussion, the Planning Commission/Staff recommendation
conditions of approval for the Monroe Excavation Special Review
were revised and amended as follows: 1) The site shall be operated
as represented by the applicant in their materials, except as
modified by these conditions: 2) No equipment or vehicles may
be stored or parked overnight within 125 feet of CR 74E and shall
be screened with landscaping to be approved by the staff and installed
within 6 months of approval. Equipment may be dropped off and
picked up in the area next to the ROW provided the area is separated
from the ROW with a barrier, i.e., rocks, berm, etc.; 3) No inoperable
equipment or vehicle shall remain on the site for more than 45
days; 4) There shall be no parking, backing into or loading/unloading
within or adjacent to the County Road ROW; 5) Access to the site
will be from a shared driveway with the property to the east.
A waiver to Section 3 of the Larimer County Access Policy allowing
a second driveway will be allowed. The location and plans, including
line of site distance, shall be reviewed and approved by the Larimer
County Engineering Department. All other access points shall
be abandoned and reclaimed; 6) The applicant shall prepare a materials,
spill and hazardous material management plan, as described in
the memo from the Larimer County Department of Health and Environment.
This plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Larimer County
Department of Health and Environment prior to issuance of building
permits for Phase II; 7) The applicant shall prepare a grading/drainage
plan/report, as discussed in the memo from the Larimer County
Engineering Department dated June 17, 1998; 8) No vehicle shall
be allowed to idle on the site for longer than 15 minutes, unattended
and shall not be allowed to idle overnight. Electric engine warmers
shall be provided for cold weather operations; 9) The applicant
shall comply with the recommendations of the Larimer County Wildfire
Coordinator in the memo dated June 16, 1998; 10) All fuel on site
shall be stored in a manner consistent with the Building Code,
Fire Code and the State of Colorado; 11) Fire protection for Phase
One, vehicle parking shall be the provision of a fire cabinet
on site, which shall contain at least two Class ABC 20 lb. fire
extinguishers. For Phase Two, shop and home, the applicant shall
provide 3500 gallons of water for fire fighting purposes on site.
This may be cistern or tank and must have fittings that are
compatible with the Red Feather Fire Department; 12) The applicant
shall submit a site plan for review and approval by the County
staff prior to submitting building permits for Phase Two. Permits
for the well and sanitation systems shall comply with all governmental
requirements.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
adopt the staff findings and Planning Commission/Staff recommendation
and approve the Monroe Excavation Special Review (#98-ZR1202),
with the conditions as revised and outlined above.
Motion carried 3-0.
The hearing adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1998
The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:00 a.m. in regular
session with Frank Lancaster, County Manager. Chair Olson presided
and Commissioners Clarke and Disney were present. Also present
were: Ralph Jacobs, Director Human Resources; Patsi Maroney, Compensation
& Benefits Specialist; Donna Hart, Staff Services Manager
Commissioners' Office; Deni LaRue, Community Information Manager;
and Tom Clayton, CSU Fall Intern. Recording Clerk, Sherry Graves.
1. OPEN SESSION FOR PUBLIC COMMENT: Francis Banderet
informed the Board that his family is still having problems regarding
access at the west end of County Road 6 and he heard the County
isn't going to do anything about it and he asked why the County
is backing out of this situation. Mr. Banderet submitted copies
of letters from the Engineering Department, dated 1992 and 1993,
stating that access to the properties to the north and west of
the proposed development must be addressed, minutes from previous
Board of County Commissioner meetings which state that CR 6 is
a County right-of-way which provides access to the property owners
in the area and indicating that on September 8, 1997 the Board
adopted a resolution for authorization to take legal action to
open the right-of-way on CR 6 to the public, and other documentation
relating to this matter. At this time Mr. Lancaster phoned County
Attorney George Haas about the status of this matter and he was
informed that this is a private matter which needs to be settled
between the Banderets and the neighbors, without County involvement.
Mr. Banderet asked the Board, if that is the case, then why
were they told it was a public road. The Board stated that the
County can't spend tax monies on litigation to resolve the many
similar instances that would arise if the County stepped in to
try and resolve this situation. Mr. Banderet expressed concern
that now the neighbors have put up a locked gate in the emergency
easement to the subdivision and emergency vehicles either may
not be able to get in or be delayed; the Board expressed concern
about this and assured Mr. Banderet that they will check on it.
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR WEEK OF OCTOBER 5, 1998:
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the Minutes for the week of October 5, 1998, as submitted.
Motion carried 3-0.
3. APPROVAL OF SCHEDULE FOR WEEK OF OCTOBER 19, 1998:
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the Schedule for the week of October 19, 1998, as submitted
and revised.
Motion carried 3-0.
4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA:
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the following documents as listed on the Consent Agenda
on Document Review for October 13, 1998:
PETITIONS FOR ABATEMENT AND REFUND OF TAXES, as recommended
by the County Assessor, were approved for the following: Robert
J/Clark & Richard Roadway; Horton Cattle Companies; Ducharme
Construction; Paul & Jessie Cook; Guadalupe & Andrea Alvarez;
Carlson's Investment & Management, LTD.; Glen & Trudi
Geilenkirchen; Susan & Francis McCarley; Gregory Morgenstern;
Robert Hultman; and JFK Associates, LLC.
LIQUOR LICENSES: Licenses were issued for: Horsetooth
Liquor - 6% - Fort Collins, CO.; Al's Canyon Grill - 6% - Fort
Collins, CO.; and Fargo County Roadhouse - 6% - Fort Collins,
CO. County approval was granted to the Windjammer Lounge - 6%
- Loveland, CO. and La Chaumiere, Inc. - 6% - Lyons, CO.
A98-162 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND VAUGHT FRYE ARCHITECTS, P.C.
(Phase 2 Architectural and Design Services for Parks Visitors Center)
A98-163 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LARIMER COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ARVADA
EXCAVATING (Closure and Revegetation of Phase I Larimer County
Landfill)
C98-57 MASTER CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AND EMPLOYMENT (Initial Changes to Original
JTPA Contract)
C98-58 CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND KENNEY & ASSOCIATES (Preparation
of Presentation Package for the Fairground
& Events Center)
D98-16 DEED OFDEDICATION FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY BY
EDWARD l. & SHARON M. Gillette (Project #208 - CR 56)
D98-17 DEED OF DEDICATION FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY BY
GLORIA B. CRAMER (Project #208 - CR 56)
Motion carried 3-0.
5. REQUEST FROM EMPLOYEE MEDICAL COMMITTEE TO FUND FLU SHOTS FOR EMPLOYEES: Ms. Maroney requested direction from the Board regarding a request from the Employee Medical Insurance Advisory Committee to provide free flu shots to interested employees; she noted that the Committee thought this would be a good use of County funds as it would help reduce or eliminate employee absences due to illness. Ms. Maroney stated that generally flu shots cost $10, either through the Health Department or at most doctor's offices; as no funds have been budgeted to cover the cost of such a program, several options were discussed regarding how to fund this expenditure and assuming that no less than 25% of our employees would take advantage of free flu shots, it could cost the County anywhere from $3,000 to $12,000 in 1998.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve a co-payment with County employees 50/50 for flu shots,
with funds to be derived from the Medical Insurance Reserve Fund.
Motion carried 3-0.
6. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FOR 1999: Ms. Maroney informed the
Board that it is time to finalize the 1999 employee benefits package
options so the Human Resources Department can prepare for the
Open Enrollment period and she requested Board approval of the
1999 insurance renewal proposals for the employee health insurance,
dental insurance, and long-term disability insurance policies.
Ms. Maroney reviewed in detail the PacifiCare 1999 renewal,
a change to a new dental third-party administrator, and an increase
in the County-paid portion of the long-term disability coverage.
Much discussion followed.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the following actions: 1) Accept the 1999 PacifiCare renewal
of 2.59% for the health insurance coverage; 2) Approve the choice
of Delta Dental as the third-party administrator for the self-funded
dental insurance plan, accept the plan design changes proposed
by Delta Dental, and increase the plan's individual annual maximum
to $1,500, all effective January 1, 1999; and 3) Increase the
County-paid portion for the long-term disability coverage with
Sun Life of Canada to $2,900 per month, effective January 1, 1999.
Motion carried 3-0.
7. WORKSESSION:
-- Annual Report: Ms. LaRue requested direction from
the Board regarding the annual report and asked if the Board liked
the concept of doing a video of the annual report and want to
continue doing a video next year; the Board responded in the affirmative.
Ms. LaRue stated that their goal is to have it ready in February
next year to be released with the annual State of the County Address.
-- Groundbreaking Ceremonies: Ms. LaRue stated that they
have been discussing with the City of Fort Collins having a combined
groundbreaking ceremony for the Courthouse and parking garage
on December 31, 1998 as part of the First Night festivities.
Much discussion of many options and scenarios followed and the
Board said the County will participate with the City of Fort Collins
in the ground breaking ceremonies.
-- Update on the Fairgrounds: Mr. Lancaster stated that
discussions are continuing regarding the design and use of the
proposed new Fairgrounds and Events Center; he noted that there
has been a lot of interest in the facility as they have been contacted
for several major horse-type events, a major tool manufacturer
is interested in a big show, and a minor baseball team is interested
in moving to the Fort Collins-Loveland Area and would like to
partner at the Fairgrounds Site.
8. COMMISSIONER REPORTS:
-- Commissioner Clarke reported that tomorrow he is going with
Mr. Gluckman to talk to Representative Steve Johnson about impact
fees.
-- Commissioner Disney reported that at the Transportation
Legislation Review Committee (TLRC) meeting they voted to sponsor
a bill allowing consumers to pay for license plate fees with credit
cards; he noted that he suggested that this bill needs to be broadened
beyond the Colorado Department of Revenue, and everyone concurred,
but the TLRC is restricted to only report out titles that have
to do with transportation and so they are going to look for a
sponsor and have a broad powers bill. Commissioner Disney noted
that the revenues they collect for credit card fees will have
to count against Tabor.
At this time County Attorney George Haas joined the meeting for legal matters.
9. LEGAL MATTERS:
-- Petitions for Annexation: Mr. Haas submitted three
Petitions for Annexation for the Board to sign consenting to the
annexation to the Town of Wellington of a portion of County Road
62 and for which they will assume responsibility of road maintenance.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve the three Petitions for Annexation of portions of County
Road 62 to the Town of Wellington and authorize the Chair to sign
same.
Motion carried 3-0.
-- Approval of Resolution: Mr. Haas requested Board
approval of a resolution prepared by the District Attorney's Office
authorizing them to represent the Clerk and Recorder in a suit
involving car titles.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
approve a Resolution authorizing the District Attorney to represent
the Larimer County Clerk and Recorder in a civil suit, and authorize
the Chair to sign same.
Motion carried 3-0.
R98-164g RESOLUTION AUTHORIZE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO
REPRESENT CLERK & RECORDER IN A CIVIL
SUIT
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board of County Commissioners
go into Executive Session at 10:40 a.m. to discuss negotiations
and potential litigation.
Motion carried 3-0.
The Executive Session ended at 11:00 a.m.; no action taken.
_________________________________________
CHAIR OLSON, CHAIR LARIMER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MYRNA J. RODENBERGER
LARIMER COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER
( S E A L )
ATTEST:
________________________________
Sherry E. Graves, Deputy County Clerk