PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1995
LAND-USE PLANNING ITEMS
(#390 & #391)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 3:00 p.m. in regular
session with Jerry White, Zoning Administrator. Chair Disney
presided; Commissioners Clarke and Duvall were present. Also
present were: Al Kadera, Subdivision Administrator; Richael Michels,
Planner II; John Pedas, Code Enforcement Officer; Harry Lynam,
Project Engineer; Doug Ryan, Environmental Health Planner; and
Jeannine Haag, Assistant County Attorney. Recording Clerk,
S. Graves.
Chair Disney noted that the following are consent items and will
not be discussed in detail unless requested by the Board or members
of the audience.
1. CONNELL RESOURCES WELLINGTON DOWNS PIT SPECIAL
REVIEW (#95-ZR0643): SW 1/4 03-06-68; NORTH SIDE OF COUNTY
ROAD 36 AND EAST OF FOSSIL CREEK RESERVOIR INLET, WEST
OF I-25; 93 ACRES; FA-1 FARMING ZONING
This is a request for Special Review to allow a sand and gravel
mine on 93 acres of 109.5 acres, to extend the life of the Stute
Pit (Case #S-57-80) by an additional five years, and to allow
the stockpiling of recycled asphalt at the Stute Pit. Staff
Findings include: 1. The proposal complies with the intent and
purpose of the Zoning Resolution and the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan; 2) The proposal is harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood
and will not have a negative effect on the neighborhood or on
property values; 3) The project will not impair the public health
or welfare with undesirable sanitary conditions or adverse environmental
impacts; 4) The proposal has been reviewed by County staff, State
agencies, and other interested parties and none have stated any
objection to this proposal.
The Staff/Planning Commission recommendation of September 20,
1995 is for approval of the Connell Resources Wellington Pit Special
Review, with the following conditions: 1) The mine shall be operated
in strict conformance with all conditions specified in the application
materials unless superseded by the "Memorandum of Agreement"
in which case, the conditions specified in the "Memorandum
of Agreement" shall be complied with; 2) The applicant will
install paving on County Road 7 from where it now stops to 50
feet south of the new entrance onto County Road 7 and construction
drawings must be submitted to and approved by County Engineering
prior to beginning construction. The paving must be completed
prior to utilizing the access point or beginning operations or
a Subdivision Improvements Agreement must be executed with appropriate
collateral; 3) No more than 38 acres will be disturbed at any
one time; 4) The applicant will take action to protect the water
rights of downstream users of Mallard Creek from the potential
damage from dewatering activities of the applicant's project;
5) The applicant will place a sign of appropriate size directing
traffic on Route 7 North and on County Road 36 East. Staff also
recommends approval of the revision to the Stute Pit Special Review
(#S-57-80) to allow five years of operation from the date of approval
by the Board of County Commissioners and to include the stockpiling
of recycled asphalt as part of that Special Review, with the following
condition: 1) The applicants must comply with Colorado Department
of Transportation recommendations for improving the access into
the Stute Pit from State Highway 68 by providing and installing
delineators to better define this access.
2. REA PARKWAY STREET NAME CHANGE (#95-0S0771): NW 23-06-68;
SOUTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 392, 1/2 MILE EAST OF I-15;
C-COMMERCIAL ZONING
This is a request to name a road "REA Parkway". Staff
Findings include: 1) REA requests the naming of a street which
will provide access to their new headquarters. Naming the road
will help emergency service providers find these building sites,
if there is an emergency; 2) The proposed road name, REA Parkway,
does not duplicate any existing road names in this area; 3) The
reviewing agencies who received this proposal have indicated no
objections. The staff recommendation is for approval of the
name REA Parkway for the proposed road.
3. FOX ACRES AMENDED MASTER PLAN (#95-MS0651): NE 1/4
28-10-73; SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 179 IN THE FOX ACRES
COUNTRY CLUB, NORTHEAST OF RED FEATHER LAKES;
2 ACRES; E-1 ESTATE ZONING
This is a request to amend the existing Fox Acres Master Plan
to allow additional recreation facilities including a swimming
pool, exercise equipment, a clubhouse and a HOA office. Staff
Findings are: 1) Fox Acres Country Club was conditionally approved
in 1978; 2) The original Master Plan did not include a visitor
center or a recreational building for the property owners; 3)
The applicant has demonstrated that adequate access and utilities
are available to serve the proposed facilities; 4) There are no
hazards present in this area that would adversely affect the proposed
use of this site; 5) Approval of the Amended Master Plan for Fox
Acres Country Club would not result in any significant negative
impacts on surrounding properties, utilities, transportation facilities
or the natural environment.
The Staff/Planning Commission recommendation of September 20,
1995 is for approval of the Fox Acres Amended Master Plan, with
the following conditions: 1) The use of this site shall be limited
to the facilities identified on the site plan submitted with this
Amended Master Plan; 2) Before the Final Plat is approved, the
applicant shall obtain approval from the State Health Department
for the appropriate discharge permit which addresses the concerns
expressed by the County Health Department. The Staff/Planning
Commission also recommend approval of the variance from the driveway
spacing criteria of the Larimer County Access Policy.
4. HIAWATHA HEIGHTS AMENDED PLAT (#95-SA0772): 29-10-73;
RED FEATHER LAKES; .4 ACRES; O-OPEN ZONING
This is a request to consolidate two lots and parts of two lots
into a single building site. Staff Findings include: 1) Hiawatha
Heights was platted in 1925; 2) The lots are relatively small
and do not meet minimum lot size requirements; 3) This Amended
Plat is intended to combine two lots and parts of two other lots
into a single building site; 4) The County Health and Engineering
Departments and all utilities serving this area reviewed the proposed
Amended Plat and stated no objections.
The Staff recommendation is for approval of the Amended Plat of
Lots 29C and 29D and a Portion of Lot 28, Block 19A and a Portion
of Lot 20, Block 19, Hiawatha Heights, with the condition that
Tract A be designated as "Not a Building Site" on the
Plat.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board adopt the Staff/Planning
Commission Recommendations and approve the Connell Resources
Wellington Downs Pit Special Review (#95-ZR0643); REA Parkway
Street Name Change (#95-0S0771); Fox Acres Amended Master Plan
(#95-MS0651); and the Hiawatha Heights Amended Plat (#95-SA0772);
each, with the conditions as outlined previously.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
5. HIGHLAND PLACE REPLAT TRACT 25 (#94-SU0581): NE 1/4 of
25-08-69; NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF
RICHARD'S LAKE ROAD AND ABBOTSFORD BETWEEN COUNTY
ROAD 54 (DOUGLAS ROAD) AND COUNTY ROAD 52 (GREGORY
ROAD); 10 ACRES; 3 LOTS; FA-1 ZONING
This is a request to divide 10 acres into 3 lots of 2.3 acres,
3.6 acres and one lot of 4 acres with an existing dwelling for
single family dwellings. This item was removed from consent
by Commissioner Duvall because she had questions about the road.
Ms. Michels noted that the only concern of staff was the septic
waiver from the UGA requirements; however, they did confirm that
this area cannot be served by the Cherry Hills Sanitation District
as they are outside their service boundaries and on June 6, 1995,
the City of Fort Collins did grant a waiver from the UGA requirements.
In response to Commissioner Duvall's concern about access,
Ms. Michels stated that as CR 13E is approaching its maximum traffic
count before improvements would be required, the County Engineering
Department is requiring an additional street waiver fee of $1,066.44
to be assessed on each new lot, over and above the $700 street
capacity fee which is normally assessed in the UGA. Staff Findings
are: 1) This proposed subdivision appears compatible with the
surrounding land uses and future development plans for the area
it is located in; 2) The applicant has obtained the necessary
waivers from the City of Fort Collins regarding sewer and street
capacity phasing criteria; 3) This proposal will not cause degradation
of wetlands, ditches or wildlife habitat; 4) The applicant has
demonstrated that the minimum technical requirements of the Larimer
County Water, Sewer and Fire Safety Standards and Procedures Manual
can be met for the construction of on-lot septic systems; 5) Approval
of this subdivision will not impair health, safety and welfare.
The Staff/Urban Growth Area Review Recommendation of September
27, 1995 is for approval of the Replat of Tract 25, Highland Place,
with the following conditions: 1) Record a deed restriction on
all tracts which obligates all current and future owners to hook
up to sanitary sewer when it is available and to join any special
improvement districts which may form for the purpose of providing
sanitary sewer or street improvements; 2) School fees of $8 per
lot for Tracts 25B and 25C must be paid before recording the Final
Plat; 3) An Annexation Agreement must be signed by the property
owners; 4) The 15' Public Service easement must be shown on the
Final Plat; 5) The following notes must be placed on the Final
Plat: a) All lot owners are obligated to hook up to sanitary sewer
when it is available and to join any special improvement districts
which may form for the purpose of providing sanitary sewer or
road improvements; b) Residential fire sprinkler systems must
be utilized in all new residential construction on Tracts 25B
and 25C; c) Property owners should not disturb the ditch easement
on the property as it is wildlife habitat and contains wetlands,
the disturbance of which requires a permit from the Department
of the Army; d) A Street Capacity Waiver Fee of $1,066.44 per
lot will be collected for Tracts 25B and 25C at the time of building
permit; e) UGA Park fees will be collected for Tracts 25B and
25C at the time of building permit; f) Dry Creek Drainage Basin
fees will be collected at the time of building permit for Tracts
25B and 25C and must be calculated by the requester; g) Engineered
footings and foundations are required for all new residential
structures; h) Any fencing near the Longs Pond Lateral ditch must
be outside of the ditch easement shown on the plat; i) Property
owners should be aware that there is the potential for wildlife
damage on this property. Property owners should take appropriate
measures to protect property. The Division of Wildlife is not
responsible for damage or control of wildlife.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Duvall moved that the Board adopt the Staff Findings
and Staff/Urban Growth Area Review Board Recommendation and approve
the Highland Place Replat of Tract 25 (#94-SU0581), with the conditions
as outlined.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
6. FORGET-ME-NOT FARM MINOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
(#95-EX0751): NE 1/4 15-06-70; NORTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 27,
1/8 MILE WEST OF THE JUNCTION OF COUNTY ROAD 38E AND
COUNTY ROAD 27 (MASONVILLE); 3.34 ACRES; 2 LOTS; O-OPEN
ZONING
This is a request to divide 3.34 acres into two parcels of 1.01
acres with an existing residence and 2.33 acres for a future residence;
a lot size variance and MRD appeal were previously approved.
Ms. Michels described the proposal, reviewed the major concerns
and issues, and noted that access is the only issue on which staff
and the applicant are in disagreement. Ms. Michels noted that
this project currently takes access from a 50 ft. public right-of-way
called Otter Drive; the applicants are proposing a separate point
of access for the new lot off of County Road 27 and this new point
of access would be 145 ft. from the cut in CR 27 for Otter Drive
and the County Engineering Department does not support the proposed
use of two separate access points for this proposal. Staff
Findings are: 1) This proposed subdivision appears compatible
with the surrounding land uses and future development plans for
the area it is located in; 2) This proposal will not cause degradation
of wetlands, ditches or wildlife habitat; 3) The applicant has
demonstrated that the minimum technical requirements of the Larimer
County Water, Sewer and Fire Safety Standards and Procedures Manual
can be met for the construction of on-lot septic systems; 4) The
approval of this subdivision, with certain conditions, should
not adversely affect the health, safety, or welfare of existing
residents.
Applicant Mark Miller reviewed the reason they are proposing a
second access and noted that another option would be to change
the configuration of the lot, but that is not a preferred option.
Mr. Lynam responded that there is only 300 feet across the
property and it is too close for a second access. Mr. Miller
stated that even though their request for a second access is their
preference, they will abide by whatever the Board decides because
he doesn't want to delay approval of the MRD any longer. Discussion
followed and the conditions of the Staff recommendation for approval
were amended as follows: 1) Both lots must achieve access from
Otter Drive; 2) A 40' asphalt apron must be installed on Otter
Drive at the intersection with County Road 27. Construction
drawings must be approved by County Engineering prior to beginning
construction; 3) The following notes must be placed on the Final
Plat: a) Engineered footings and foundations are required for
new residential construction; b) Uses are limited to single family
residential only; c) Park fees are required with new residential
building permits; d) Off-site Section 2.8 road fees of $ 535.36
will be collected for new construction on Tract 1; e) Residential
Fire Sprinkler systems are required in all new residential construction;
f) Tracts 1 and 2 must achieve access from Otter Drive; g) There
is the potential for wildlife interaction or property damage in
this area. The State Division of Wildlife is not responsible
for damage caused by wildlife nor will it be responsible for removal
of wildlife from the property; h) Both lots must participate in
the Homeowners' Association established for maintenance of Otter
Drive.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board adopt the Staff Findings
and Staff Recommendation and approve the Forget-Me-Not Minor
Residential Development, with the conditions as outlined and amended.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
7. BREEDLOVE BOARDING HOUSE ZONING VIOLATION (#95-ZV0581):
36-05-69; 3739 ROBIN COURT IN LOVELAND, LOT 54 IN ROSS
ESTATES
This alleged violation is for operating a boarding house/missionary/half-way house in the R-1 Residential Zoning District. Mr. Pedas informed the Board that this matter has been resolved because the property has been sold; however, since several adjacent property owners came to today's hearing to voice their objections to what has been going on, the Board requested Mr. Pedas to explain the situation more fully. Mr. Pedas informed the neighbors that the Breedloves have purchased an acre of land that has several houses on it and the closing on the subject property is set for October 26, 1995.
8. MANOR RIDGE ESTATES 3RD, 4TH & 5TH FILINGS RELEASE OF
WARRANTY COLLATERAL (#S-90-91); 24-06-69, EAST OF HIGHWAY
287, SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 32.
This is a request for the release of Warranty Collateral. Mr.
Kadera reviewed the major concerns and issues. Staff Findings
are: 1) Manor Ridge Estates Third, Fourth, and Fifth Filings have
been completed and the developer has been released from his obligations
under the Subdivision Improvements Agreements; 2) The County is
holding $8,721.75 in warranty collateral for improvements that
have been inspected and released; 3) The improvements in Manor
Ridge Estates have been inspected by the County Engineering Staff
and were found to be consistent with the approved plans; 4) Manor
Ridge Estates Homeowners Association requested that the County
continue to hold the warranty collateral until an agreement could
be reached concerning a drainage problem in the Third Filing.
The Staff recommendation is that since the improvements have
been inspected and approved by the County Engineering Staff and
the warranty period has expired, the warranty collateral should
be released.
Brad Bennett, President of Brokers West Real Estate Marketing
& Development, Inc. and representative for the applicant,
noted that the drainage improvements in question were not included
in the warranty collateral that were part of the public improvements;
he described the drainage situation in detail. Rick Madbeck,
Vice President Homeowner's Association, explained his version
of the drainage problem; he noted that the drainage problem has
been solved but they feel the developer should pay his fair share
of the cost for solving the problem and that is why they are asking
for the collateral to be withheld. Regina Trapp, property
owner in the subdivision, stated she could not sit outside because
of the mosquitoes and could not walk in her yard without sinking
to her knees, all because of the swamp conditions created by the
lack of drainage. Commissioner Duvall asked what was required
of the developer in the original agreement; Mr. Kadera responded
that the developer was required to complete all improvements,
which he has done. Discussion and questions from the Board
followed and they indicated that they need more information before
they can make a decision. They want to know: 1) If the improvements
for drainage were improperly designed; 2) If it was the intention
all along that this open area become a detention pond; 3) If the
pipe that was installed is a temporary solution and will result
in a continuing maintenance problem; 4) Whether or not there was
a utility boring under the road on the First Filing to serve the
Fifth Filing.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Duvall moved that the Board table the Manor Ridge
Estates 3rd, 4th & 5th Filings Release of Warranty Collateral
(#S-90-91) until Monday, December 4, 1995.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
9. TRAPPER'S POINT 2ND FILING (#93-SU0381): W 1/2, 02-07-68, EAST
SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 5, 1/2 MILE NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 48;
103.78 ACRES; 19 LOTS; FA-1 FARMING ZONING
This is a request to divide 103.78 acres into 19 lots for single
family dwellings (2 existing) ranging in size from 2.3 acres to
17.8 acres with 31.3 acres open space; this proposal was previously
reviewed as Trapper's Lake, Lac Hyatt and Trost MRD. Mr. Kadera
noted that this request was denied by the Board on May 8, 1995;
subsequently, the applicant has submitted a request for reconsideration,
which was granted. Mr. Kadera informed the Board that the applicant
is proposing the use of new technology for the septic systems.
He noted that staff has consistently recommended approval of
this project because they meet the standards required by the Water,
Sewer & Fire Standards. Mr. Kadera stated that the wetland
area was a concern and staff had indicated a desire to have that
area included in the lots so a specific property owner would be
responsible for it; however, the Board thought it should be open
space and become the responsibility of all the property owners.
Mr. Kadera stated that a unique proposal on this site is that
the applicant has agreed to pave CR 5 from their south boundary
to the midpoint, and they have agreed to put a provision in the
covenants that the Homeowner's Association is responsible for
dust mitigation on the remainder of CR5 and there will be funds
placed in the HOA account by this developer as seed money to make
sure there are funds available, until all the lots are sold and
dues are paid.
In response to questions from the Board regarding the new technology
being proposed for the septic systems, Mr. Ryan noted that in
July 1995 he met with the applicant and a developer who owns a
sewer system company in Summit County; a presentation was given
of an aerobic packaged plant that is installed on each individual
lot and operates on the same principle as a public sewer system.
However, he noted that on the negative side, these systems
do require maintenance and he recommended that their be a stipulation
in the homeowner's covenants that they have to hire or consult
with a certified Class D sewage treatment plant operator regarding
system maintenance. Commissioner Duvall asked Mr. Ryan questions
and requested additional clarification about this aerobic system
and she asked if he recommends the White Water Aerobic Treatment
System; he responded that the aerobic treatment system would be
a higher quality than the standard septic tank and leaching field
system, but requiring maintenance is mandatory and he is not endorsing
any particular brand of system.
Staff Findings include: 1) The proposed Trapper's Point Second
Filing is consistent with the existing zoning of the site and
with existing development in the area; 2) Particular attention
must be paid to wetland protection and the citing of septic systems
on this property, but these factors should not prevent development
of the site; 3) This project will result in impacts on the county
roads in this area. This applicant should be responsible for
mitigating any potential complaints concerning dust on County
Road 56 north of the access to this subdivision; 4) Adequate utility
service and fire protection are available to this site; 5) Approval
of the Preliminary Plat for Trappers Point Second Filing, with
the following conditions, will not result in any significant negative
impacts on surrounding properties, utility services, transportation
facilities or the natural environment.
Jim Martell, attorney for the applicant, reviewed what the applicant
has done since the March 23 and May 8, 1995 meetings to mitigate
the concerns raised at those meetings regarding the wetlands and
the septic systems; he noted that this project has always met
the county's requirements for septic systems but now they are
proposing a new aerobic treatment system approved by the County
Health Department, and they agree that the systems will be maintained
by the homeowner's association and will be inspected at any interval
the Health Department believes is appropriate. Mr. Martell
noted that this aerobic system will be discharged into the septic
envelopes and the water coming out will be 96% pure and better
than a municipal system. Mr. Martell presented a large packet
(exhibit) of information to the Board, including the protective
covenant amendments: 1) Requiring a 100-ft. setback to insure
that cattle will not be allowed around the lake; 2) Requiring
an easement which cannot be amended without county approval to
insure that the open space remains; 3) Requiring certain conditions
to resolve the septic systems issue.
Neil Sherrod, geologist from Empire Laboratories reported on the
perc tests they performed on the site and noted that the proposal
for the aerobic system with the standard septic system is a dual
system and provides much more protection for the environment.
Discussion among the Board followed; Chair Disney requested that
a condition be added that not only will a Class D Inspector be
required, but that all maintenance or cleaning of the system must
be done by a licensed systems cleaner. Commissioner Duvall
requested that Cedar Creek Associates see the covenants; Mr. Martell
indicated that could be required and that they be approved by
Cedar Creek Associates before Final Plat. Commissioner Duvall
discussed the conditions and asked if this area is unique and
really needs the aerobic system; Mr. Ryan responded in the negative,
but he suggested that a condition be added that the Health Department
is to review the covenants and give recommendations regarding
which type of septic system to install, the frequency and intensity
of maintenance, and if the aerobic system is used, that something
be included in the covenants that requires that a certified Class
D sewage treatment operator consultant be a part of the maintenance
agreement, prior to Final Plat approval. After further discussion,
the staff recommendation conditions of approval for the Preliminary
Plat for Trapper's Point Second Filing were amended as follows:
1) The Final Plat shall include a septic envelope on each lot.
A note on the Plat and a passage in the protective covenants
shall indicate that each septic envelope shall be reserved only
for septic system installation. No other facilities shall be
permitted in the septic envelope. The Health Department will
review and recommend the type of system to be used for sewage
disposal and if the recommendation includes an aerobic system,
the people who inspect and maintain that system must hold a Class
D sewage treatment operator's license; 2) Construction plans shall
be subject to the review and approval of the County Engineer,
the East Larimer County Water District, and the Poudre Fire Authority;
3) Construction plans shall include the reconstruction of County
Road 5 from County Road 48 to the north property line of this
project; paving of only the south half of CR5 shall be required;
4) Wetlands on this site shall be identified by a qualified wetlands
consultant and these areas shall be clearly identified on the
Final Plat; that consultant will review the protective covenants
as prepared by the developer for Tract A, and a wetlands management
plan and the protective covenants will be based on the consultant's
recommendations. A note on the Final Plat shall clearly indicate
that no disturbance of the wetland areas is permitted; 5) The
Final Plat shall include utility easements requested by the utility
companies serving this area; 6) Final Plat documents shall address
the irrigation laterals on this site and define the lot owners'
responsibilities regarding the irrigation facilities. Any fences
across the irrigation laterals shall be provided with a 20-foot
gate for maintenance purposes; 7) The applicant shall demonstrate
that an access road is feasible to the building site east of the
lake on Lot 17. Lot 18A shall include the pedestrian, open
space, access easement that was shown on the Final Plat of Trappers
Point First Filing; 8) The homeowners association for the Second
Filing shall be joined with the association formed for the First
Filing with all the same rights and responsibilities; 9) All notes
shown on the Preliminary Plat shall appear on the Final Plat;
these notes address park fees, radon tests, engineered foundations,
access from internal subdivision streets and setbacks; 10) The
homeowner's documents shall include a mechanism for collecting
dues for the purpose of applying a dust palliative on the unpaved
portion of County Road 5 north of the access to his project.
The documents shall include a provision for intervention by
the County if the homeowners fail to perform.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board adopt the Staff Findings
and Staff Recommendation and approve the Trapper's Point 2nd Filing
(#93-SU0381), with the conditions as outlined and amended.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1995
MEETING REGARDING 1996 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PACKAGE
(#392)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 2:00 p.m. in regular
session with Ralph Jacobs, Director of Human Resources. Chair
Disney presided; Commissioners Clarke and Duvall were present.
Also present were: Patsi Maroney, Compensation & Benefits
Specialist; Jean Moore, Mercer & Company Benefits Consultant;
Janene Bourn and Ruth Merrill, Members of the Employee Medical
Insurance Advisory Committee; Bob Keister, Budget Manager; Neil
Gluckman, Assistant County Manager; and Frank Lancaster, County
Manager. Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
1. HEALTH INSURANCE OPTIONS FOR 1996: Ms. Maroney reviewed
the employee medical insurance renewal options and requested a
decision from the Board which option they prefer. Ms. Maroney
noted that Option #1 is to retain the current structure of the
health insurance program (which is a triple option plan of HMO,
PPO and indemnity) and accept a 18.9% premium increase for 1996;
or Option #2, which is to change the structure and accept the
rate guarantee that CIGNA offered last year as part of their bid
for the County contract, which is a 11% premium increase. Option
#2 would still offer a triple option plan of HMO, POS, and the
indemnity plan--only the 33% of the employees who have the PPO
Plan will see a change in their medical insurance plan. Ms.
Maroney described the differences between the PPO and POS; she
noted that the Human Resources Department, the Mercer Benefits
Consultants, and the Employee Medical Insurance Advisory Committee
all recommend that the Board select Option #2. Questions and
discussion among the Board followed. Commissioner Duvall requested
Human Resources to prepare a matrix to explain very clearly the
difference between the two plans to the employees.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Duvall moved that the Board authorize the Human Resources
Department to proceed with Option #2 for the CIGNA 1996 employee
medical insurance program, resulting in an 11% premium increase,
and direct the Human Resources to provide information to the employees
clearly describing the differences between the two options.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
2. DENTAL INSURANCE ENHANCEMENT OPTIONS FOR 1996: Ms. Mahoney
requested a decision from the Board regarding several employee-paid
dental insurance plan enhancements for 1996. Ms. Maroney outlined
three options for the Board to consider: 1) Make no plan design
changes, which would require a 5% premium increase for 1996; 2)
Make two minor plan design changes, to be effective January 1,
1996, to add coverage for sealants under the basic 80% paid after
$50 deductible level and to add coverage for dental prescriptions;
this option will also require a 5% premium increase for 1996;
3) In addition to the two minor plan design changes, add an orthodontic
benefit for children only - this option would require a 10% premium
increase for 1996. Ms. Mahoney noted that the majority of the
committee recommended that the children's orthodontic benefit
be added to the County's self-funded dental plan; however, a few
committee members didn't think it was fair to increase everyone's
costs by an additional 5% for a benefit that could only be used
by less than 40% of the County's employees.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board approve Option #2 to
add sealants and dental prescriptions as employee-paid benefit
enhancements to the County's basic self-funded dental insurance
plan, effective January 1, 1996, which will require a 5% premium
increase for 1996 to be paid by both the County and employees
carrying dependent coverage.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
3. OTHER PROPOSED EMPLOYEE-PAID BENEFIT OPTIONS FOR 1996:
Ms. Maroney also requested Board approval to add a voluntary
vision care plan and a voluntary employee-paid supplemental life
insurance plan to the County's benefit program, effective January
1, 1996. Ms. Maroney stated that, based on the results of the
employee survey two years ago which indicated that these plans
were desired by employees, these options have been reviewed by
the consultants at Mercer and they, the Human Resources Department,
and the Employee Medical Insurance Advisory Committee all recommend
that they be offered. Ms. Maroney informed the Board that
the vision care plan would cover yearly eye exams, new lenses
annually, new frames every 24 months, and new contact lenses annually.
The premiums would be entirely employee-paid and there is a minimum
enrollment of 10% required in order to offer the coverage--at
least 110 people need to sign up for the vision care plan during
the enrollment period. Ms. Maroney further added that the vision
care premiums are eligible to go under the Premium Conversion
portion of the County's Flexible Spending Account plan; i.e.,
they can pay the premiums with pre-tax dollars. With regard
to the supplemental life insurance plan, employees could choose
term insurance coverage up to 5 times their annual salary for
themselves, up to $150,000 on a spouse, and up to $20,000 on dependent
children; the premiums would be paid entirely by the employee
and there is not a minimum enrollment requirement. Ms. Maroney
noted that the only cost for these additional benefit plans, would
be additional administration costs in the Human Resources Department.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Duvall moved that the Board approve the addition
of the voluntary employee-paid vision care plan through Vision
Service Plan and the addition of the voluntary employee-paid supplemental
life insurance plan through LINA to the County's insurance benefit
program.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
4. UPDATE ON SALARY FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR: Mr. Jacobs submitted
a summary sheet showing the salaries of the Planning Directors
in the Front Range Counties. After discussion, the Board
recommended the Planning Director position for Larimer County
be advertised in a hiring range between $53,000 to $58,000, with
a 6-month probation period, and then a 5% increase if satisfactory.
Mr. Lancaster noted that Mr. Hart has to commit $400 tomorrow
if the County wishes to guarantee advertising space in the December
issue of the American Planning Association Journal; CONSENSUS
OF THE BOARD was to authorize Mr. Hart to commit to this advertising
space in the APA Journal for the December issue.
The meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m.
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1995
OPEN SESSION FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
(#392 (Side B)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:00 a.m. in regular
session with Frank Lancaster, County Manager. Chair Disney
presided; Commissioners Clarke and Duvall were present. Also
present were Neil Gluckman, Assistant County Manager, and Donna
Hart, Assistant to the County Manager. Recording Clerk, S.
Graves.
Mr. Lancaster noted there were a few routine administrative matters
which needed Board approval today since a regular Administrative
Matters meeting is not scheduled today because of the Board's
budget worksession all day. Mr. Lancaster requested Board approval
of a resolution to stop the assessments on the Bo-Mar Local Improvement
District.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board approve a Resolution
Terminating Assessments Upon the Real Property within Larimer
County Bo-Mar Local Improvement District No. 21, and authorize
the Chair to sign same.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
R95-165d RESOLUTION TERMINATING ASSESSMENTS UPON THE REAL
PROPERTY WITHIN LARIMER COUNTY BO-MAR LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 21
Mr. Lancaster noted that another matter which has a timeline is
the Even Start Learning Center will be publishing a multi-cultural
calendar to be sold throughout the community and they are asking
for organizations that are involved in diversity and multi-cultural
issues to sponsor one month of the calendar by paying the printing
costs of $150. CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD was to approve this request
and they chose the month of May, if it is not already spoken for;
monies for this sponsorship will be derived from the Commissioner's
Special Projects Fund.
At this time Clarence Adair, Civil Rights Director for the Rocky
Mountain Forest Service, joined the open session for public comment.
Mr. Adair informed the Board that tomorrow they are having
a Federal Heritage Festival and soliciting copies of everyone's
diversity plan or civil rights plan. Commissioner Duvall informed
Mr. Adair that on November 9, 1995 all the entities which have
been involved in the Multi-Cultural Commission will be reporting
on where they are and what they have accomplished; she also noted
that Larimer County recently conducted a survey to determine how
the employees feel about cultural diversity in the county and
those results should be out before that meeting.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Clarke moved that the Board approve the Schedule
for the week of October 30, 1995, as submitted and amended.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
Invitations: Ms. Hart reviewed the pending invitations with
the Board and they indicated to her which events they could attend.
The meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m.
____________________________________
JIM DISNEY, CHAIR
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
( S E A L )
ATTEST:
__________________________________________
Sherry E. Graves, Deputy County Clerk
October 24, 1995