PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, AUGUST 22, 1994
SUBDIVISIONS
(#104 & #105)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:00 a.m. in regular
session with John Barnett, Director of Planning. Chair Duvall
presided; Commissioners Disney and Hotchkiss presided. Also present
were: Russell Legg, Senior Planner; Jerry White, Zoning Administrator;
Rex Burns, Engineering; Jerry Blehm, Environmental Health; and
Jeannine Haas, Assistant County Attorney. Recording Clerk, S.
Graves.
Mr. Barnett informed the Board that the following two items listed
on today's agenda for tabling, Pit Stop Special Review (#94-ZR0401)
and the Eagle Kennels Special Review (#94-ZR0467), have been withdrawn
by the applicants. Mr. Barnett requested that the Board table
the Carter Lake Enterprises Special Review until September 12,
1994.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board table the Carter Lake
Enterprises Special Review (#94-ZR0469) until September 12, 1994,
as requested by Mr. Barnett.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
Mr. Barnett also noted that the Rabbit Shadow Farms Rezoning and
Special Review ((#94-MZ0450) has been withdrawn from today's agenda.
1. CHURCH SUBDIVISION (#93-SU0346): SW 1/4 35-05-69; NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 17 (TAFT
AVENUE) AND COUNTY ROAD 14 (42ND STREET); 18.59 ACRES;
11 LOTS; FA-FARMING ZONING (08-22-94).
This is a request to divide 18.5 acres into 10 lots of 0.96 to
1.34 acres for single family dwellings and one lot of 3.25 acres
for an existing church. Mr. Legg provided the background information,
submitted an aerial map of the site, and reviewed the major concerns
and issues noting that the area is designated Urban Reserve in
the Loveland Urban Growth Agreement. Mr. Legg further stated
that the residents in the area are concerned with the proposed
residential density and the county has a concern with the internal
configuration and design and its relationship to the two external
county roads. Mr. Legg noted that a report regarding this request
has not yet been received by the City of Loveland. Staff Findings
include: 1) The proposed Church Subdivision is consistent with
the zoning of the site and with the density guidelines contained
in the Intergovernmental Agreement for the Loveland Urban Growth
Area; 2) Significant improvements are needed on County Road 14
and County Road 17 to correct some turn lane deficiencies; this
developer will be solely responsible for these improvements; 3)
This project has adequate fire protection and utility services;
4) Approval of this project with the following conditions will
not result in any significant negative impacts on surrounding
properties, utility services, transportation facilities or the
natural environment.
The Planning Commission/Staff recommendations are for denial of
the variance concerning the length of a dead-end street; approval
of the waiver concerning contiguity with existing development;
approval of the waiver concerning off-site capacity improvements,
with the condition that the applicant sign an Annexation Agreement
and each lot shall be assessed a Waiver Fee, payable when building
permits are issued, and approval of the Preliminary Plat for Church
Subdivision, with the following conditions: 1) The Final Plat
shall be completed in strict conformance with the minimum requirements
of the Larimer County Subdivision regulations and with the conditionally
approved Preliminary Plat; 2) All concerns expressed by the County
Engineer shall be addressed in the Final Plat application. All
improvements to County Roads 14 and 17, required by the County
Engineer shall be included in the Subdivision Improvements Agreements
and coveredby appropriate collateral; 3) Prior to Final Plat approval,
the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Consolidated
Home Supply Ditch and Reservoir Company; 4) The Final Plat application
shall include a landscaping plan for the lots which identifies
the location, size and species of a street tree on each lot and
a method of ensuring the successful planting of a tree on each
lot; 5) The Final Plat include plans for a school bus loading
area on the site. The applicant should consult with the school
district concerning the appropriate location for this facility;
6) Construction plans for this project shall be signed by the
County Engineer, Little Thompson Water District, Town of Berthoud
and the Loveland Fire Prevention Bureau; 7) All construction costs
shall be identified and included in a Subdivision Improvements
Agreement. Acceptable collateral shall be provided to ensure
the completion of all required improvements; 8) The following
notes shall appear on the Final Plat: A) Engineered foundation
plans shall be required for all construction on this site; B)
The results of a radon test shall be submitted to the Planning
Division before a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for any single
family dwelling on this site; C) Park Fees shall be paid when
a building permit is issued for any single family dwelling on
this site; D) A Street Waiver Fee shall be paid when building
permits are issued for any single family dwelling on this site;
E) Drainage Fees, if applicable, shall be paid when building permits
are issued for any single family dwelling on this site; F) Prospective
lot owners should be aware of the existing agricultural activities
in this area. Agricultural uses often result in noise, odors,
and/or dust that might not be compatible with residential uses.
Larimer County will not take any action to stop or hinder legal
agricultural uses of property in this area.
Mr. Burns addressed the road concerns noting that the applicant
will be required to construct auxiliary road improvements at both
locations, CR 17 and Campion Road; i.e., left turn lanes and construction
of accel and decel lanes at both entrances to the project. However,
Mr. Burns stated there is disagreement with the internal circulation
and hopefully the applicant will agree to extend the road within
the subdivision out to CR 17.
Dave Poeschel, of Landstar Surveying, addressed the Board stating
that the applicant has agreed to all the conditions set forth
by staff. Dirk Banks and Paul Humberson, adjacent property owners,
expressed concerns regarding the contiguity waiver, existing agricultural
uses in the area, redesigning of CR 17, and noted that the main
arterial street is so large that the children are not allowed
to cross it and will have to take the bus 2 1/2 blocks to school,
and they think that comments from the City of Loveland should
be reviewed before this proposal is approved. Discussion followed;
Chair Duvall commented that, in her opinion, this proposal is
stretching the concept of contiguity and therefore she cannot
support it.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board adopt the Staff Findings
and Staff Recommendation and approve the Church Subdivision (#93-SU0346).
Motion carried 2 - 1; Chair Duvall dissenting.
2. CDL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (#94-MS0444): NE 1/4
21-06-68; SOUTH SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 32, 1/2 MILE WEST
OF I-25; 150.51 ACRES; 40 LOTS; AP-AIRPORT ZONING (08-22-94)
This is a request for a Master Plan and Preliminary Phase Plan
to divide 150 acres into 40 lots of 1.4 to 3.6 acres for single
family residential use with 45 acres of open space proposed.
Mr. Legg provided the project description and reviewed the major
concerns and issues noting that staff has concerns relating to
transportation in the area and stormwater management; he noted
that the property will have public water and sewer. Staff Findings
are 1) The proposed Planned Unit Development is consistent with
the Larimer County Land Use Plan concerning use, density and design
concept for development within the Rural Non-Farm area between
Fort Collins and Loveland; 2) The proposed Planned Unit Development
is consistent with the Planned Unit Development Resolution and
the Comprehensive Zoning Resolution; 3) Approval of the proposed
Planned United Development Master Plan and Preliminary Phase Plan,
with the following conditions, will not result in a significant
negative impact on surrounding properties, utility services, transportation
facilities or the natural environment.
The Planning Commission/Staff recommendations are for approval
of the CDL Subdivision Master Plan for 40 single family lots;
and approval of the Preliminary Phase Plan, with eleven conditions.
Mr. Burns addressed the transportation concerns and recommended
that the homeowners in this Planned Unit Development be required
to pay road impact fees to help defray costs for future road improvements
and he noted that a future right-of-way for access to the property
to the south should also be provided by the developer. Mr. Legg
also suggested a note recognizing agricultural uses in the area
be placed on the Final Plat.
Ken Merritt, Landmark Planner, stated that the applicant will
provide a traffic impact study and abide by all the recommendations
of that study and, with regard to the imposition of road impact
fees, they will do their fair share and whatever else is required
of them. Mr. Merritt described the original proposal and reviewed
the changes made to today's proposal, which was the applicant's
attempt to address the concerns raised by staff at the time of
Concept Technical Review.
Denise Praizler requested the Board deny this proposal as it is
not "fitting" with the IGA, the density is too high
(should be one home per five acres), it does not fit in with the
Fossil Creek wildlife area, and has not received approval from
the airport. She addressed the wildlife concern in detail and
would like to have a wildlife management plan presented; she also
would like to see a traffic impact plan, noting there are existing
potholes on CR 32 and additional traffic will have a tremendous
impact on this road and she also stated that this proposal should
be denied until the Corridor Task Force study is completed.
Mr. Merritt responded to Ms. Praizler's concerns and noted that
one of the conditions to be met requires a management plan for
the wetland areas and a final landscaping plan to be submitted
with the Final Plat. Discussion followed; Chair Duvall expressed
her concern about the cumulative effect of the traffic on CR 32,
as each proposal is approved, and stated that the Board is being
asked to vest rights to develop this property without complete
information. Commissioner Hotchkiss stated that after visiting
this site, he thinks this is the best use for this land if we
believe in open space and separation--as the corner is going to
be commercial, the land north is zoned commercial, and this proposal
meets the criteria for approval. Commissioner Disney stated that,
in his opinion, this proposal is not compatible with the surrounding
land uses and it represents leap-frog development.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board deny the CDL Planned
Unit Development (#94-MS0444).
Motion carried 2 - 1; Commissioner Hotchkiss dissenting.
3. VISTA BONITA 7TH FILING (#94-SU0443): SE 1/4 10-07-68; 3/4 OF A
MILE EAST OF I-25 AND 1/4 MILE NORTH OF COLORADO HIGHWAY
14; 7.87 ACRES; 26 LOTS; R1-RESIDENTIAL ZONING (8-23-94).
This is a request for Preliminary Plat approval to divide 7.87
acres into 26 lots ranging in size from 0.18 acres to 0.43 acres
for single family residential use and for rezoning from R-1 to
R-2 Residential. Mr. White reviewed the project description,
noting this development is a natural progression of development
of this property; however, he noted that the lots in this filing
will be smaller than most of the previous six filings. Mr.
White stated that the major issues are compatibility and access.
The Staff Findings include: 1) The proposal is compatible with
the surrounding neighborhood, and will not have a negative impact
on property values in the area; 2) The proposal complies with
the intent and purposes of the Comprehensive Zoning Resolution,
County Land Use Plan, and Intergovernmental Agreements with the
City of Fort Collins; 3) The proposal is consistent with the recommendations
of review agencies and will comply with all technical requirements,
if developed in accordance with the recommended conditions; 4)
There will not be a negative impact on utilities, transportation
network, transportation facilities, or drainage facilities and
patterns.
The Staff/Urban Growth Area Review Board recommendation is for approval of the Preliminary Plat and for rezoning from R-1 to R-2 Residential, with the following conditions: 1) Except as modified by the following conditions, all development and use shall be consistent with the plans submitted for review; 2) Only single family dwellings shall be allowed; 3) Details of proposed street lighting shall be provided with Final Plat submittal; 4) Disclosure shall be made to all lot purchasers of the following: A) Property adjacent on the west is zoned M-Multiple Family; B) Streets in this development are public streets, and may provide access to future development in the area; 5) All utilities must be underground; 6) Final Plat shall include metes and bounds description of the open space easement; covenants shall describe the uses allowed and prohibited within this easement; 7) An erosion control plan shall be submitted with the Final Plat, which includes the recommendations of the Soil Conservation Service; 8) The following notes shall be included on the Final Plat: A) Camino del Mundo and Sierra Vista Drive are public streets and will likely provide access to other future development in the area; B) The property adjacent to Vista Bonita 7th Filing is zoned for multiple family development; C) There is a potential for nuisance wildlife conflicts, including destruction of landscaping by geese; D) A non-motorized public trail may be developed along Boxelder Creek, adjacent to lots 12- 21; E) No building may be constructed within the designated Open Space Easement on lots 12-21; covenants shall address homeowners responsibility for maintenance of the open space area behind each property, in coordination with the Division of Wildlife; F) A park fee must be paid at the time of building permit application; G) A storm drainage fee may be required to be paid at the time of building permit application; H) Engineered footings and foundation will be required for each residential structure; I) Design and construction of homes must include mitigation for radon; radon testing must be accomplished prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; J) Subdivision roads will not be maintained by Larimer County; covenants and plat shall provide for road maintenance by a homeowners' association; 9) Roads shall be designed and constructed in compliance with the Larimer County Urban Street Standards, and according to the requirements of the Larimer County Engineering Department; 10) Covenants shall include all of the plat notes listed in item #8 above, and also require installation of one street tree for each lot, at the time the lot is built upon; 11) If Final Plat is not recorded by August 22, 1997, Larimer County may consider revocation of this rezoning; 12) Developer shall sign a subdivision improvements agreement to guarantee completion of all required improvements, including roads, utilities, drainage, and erosion control during site development; 13) Assess the road at the beginning and end of development to determine which damage resulting from construction traffic; developer shall be responsible for paying for this damage; collateral shall be provided in the SIA for this purpose; 14) Submission of the plans for any further development must be accompanied by a Master Plan for the entire Fisher Ownership, as it now exists.
Rob Persichitte, Intermill Land Surveying, addressed the Board
noting that the applicant is in agreement with the conditions
as outlined. Harold Kennedy, adjacent property owner, supports
the development but is concerned about the non-acceptance of the
roads for maintenance by the county; Chair Duvall responded that
the county does not have the resources to maintain these subdivision
roads. Mr. Kennedy countered by asking for a commitment from
the Board to accept these roads for maintenance in the future,
if budgetary restraints are removed. Chair Duvall inquired
as to why there wasn't a Master Plan for this whole area and noted
that if there was an original Master Plan, the county might possibly
assume maintenance responsibility. Mr. Fisher stated there was
a Master Plan prepared in 1969 and he will submit it to staff.
Mr. Kennedy stated he has been assured that the sewer and
water will be acceptable for this area and he wondered if this
is true; Mr. Blehm responded that the water and sewer will be
provided by ELCO and the developer will be required to put the
system in according to their standards. Mr. Kennedy expressed
concern whether the existing streets will be able to withstand
the weight of the constructions trucks and he suggested the developer
put up enough money for the roads to be repaired if necessary;
Mr. Burns responded that condition #13 relates to this concern.
Mr. Kennedy advised the Board that the county has an opportunity
to acquire some beautiful open space in this area. Mr. Burns
addressed the access concerns.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board adopt the Staff Findings
and Staff/Urban Growth Area Review Board Recommendation and approve
the Vista Bonita 7th Filing, with conditions as amended.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
4. DISCUSSION REGARDING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT WITH HANK PEDERSEN:
Mr. Pedersen described the concern the Planning Commission has
with the Board of Adjustment (BOA), emphasizing that the Planning
Commission has no objections to the members of this Board, just
that the Board of County Commissioners has authorized the Board
too much power and authority. Mr. Pedersen stated that state
statute outlines how a BOA is created and what authority it has
- that authority is limited by statute and the Board of County
Commissioners can grant or restrict the authority of the BOA.
Mr. Pedersen stated that upon examining the statute, it appears
the Board of County Commissioners has gone beyond what statute
allows and has allowed the BOA to interpret the zoning resolution
and authorized them to extend non-conforming uses.
Mr. Pedersen submitted a proposed Amendment to the Larimer County
Comprehensive Zoning Resolution, prepared by himself and the Planning
Commission Chairman Steve Johnson; this proposed amendment to
Section 30.0 outlines the organization, meetings and procedure,
jurisdiction, appeals, standards and findings and criteria for
the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Pedersen stated that the Planning
Commission recommends that the BOA be given a clear definition
of what it can do--the Commission would like ambivalence eliminated;
the BOA should not be able to go around the Planning Commission
and Board of County Commissioners--they are to listen to appeals.
Commissioner Hotchkiss agreed with Mr. Pedersen but defended the
Board of Adjustment and asked whose responsibility is it to define
the duties to the BOA and keep them within their perimeters--obviously,
it is the staff; he noted that it was never intended that a person
could go to the BOA prior to going before the Planning Commission
and Board of Commissioners. The Board directed Ms. Haag to
review the proposed amendment and make suggestions to define the
role and authority of the BOA; the Board expressed confidence
that this matter can be resolved by legal counsel and staff.
The meeting recessed at 11:40 a.m.
ABATEMENT HEARING REGARDING PTARMIGAN
The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 1:30 p.m. to consider
a petition for abatement of taxes. Chair Duvall presided; Commissioners
Disney and Hotchkiss were present. Also present were Carla Woodard-Cowling,
Senior Appraiser, and Bernie Orth, Personal Property Appraiser.
Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
As the petitioner nor his representative appeared for today's
hearing, and the Assessor's Office recommended denial of the petition
for abatement of personal property taxes for Ptarmigan Golf, at
5412 Vardon Way, Fort Collins, CO., the following action was taken:
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board deny the Petition for
Abatement for Ptarmigan Golf, Schedule No. 8062048, as recommended
by the Assessor's Office.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
The meeting recessed at 1:40 p.m.
EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING SERVICES QUARTERLY MEETING
(#106)
The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 2:30 p.m. in regular
session with Joni Friedman, Interim Director of ETS. Chair Duvall
presided; Commissioners Disney and Hotchkiss were present. Also
present were: Jean Thomas, Private Industry Council Chair; Lew
Wymisner, Enterprise Zone Administrator; and Frank Lancaster,
Interim County Administrator. Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
1. Private Industry Council Update: Ms. Thomas reported that
the name of the Business Expo has been changed to September Symposium
and will be held this year on September 16 from 8 a.m. until noon;
she invited the Board to attend the Symposium and if they do attend,
Mr. Wymisner asked if they would introduce some of the speakers
for the workshops. Ms. Thomas submitted a brochure describing
the workshops and a listing of nine Employers' Roundtable Seminars
to be held throughout the year. Ms. Thomas informed the Board
that Mr. Wymisner is spearheading the 5th Annual Colorado Job
Training Conference in Snowmass Village on September 28-30, 1994,
and she extended an invitation to the Board to also attend this
Conference.
Ms. Thomas noted that this past month at their PIC Meeting, recognition
awards were presented to Dorothy Hull and Debra Anderson of Front
Range Community College. In August, the Estes Park Holiday Inn
Manager Mark Roske was recognized for his work putting together
a program for seniors to work in hotel related occupations. This
program was so successful that Holiday Inn is considering making
it a national model at other sites around the country.
2. Interim Director's Report: Ms. Friedman reported that Federal
funding was received for opening a new Dislocated Worker Center,
which will enable ETS to expand services offered to dislocated
workers; she noted that this funding was provided for only five
centers in the State and Larimer County was chosen as one of them.
Ms. Friedman stated that their program year ended June 30, 1994
and they had a very good year as they met all their performance
standards; she enumerated the numbers of older workers, dislocated
workers, adult disadvantaged and youth enrolled in their various
programs and their placement rate; she expressed appreciation
to the excellent staff at ETS.
There was mention of the possibility of the Veterans Service Office
moving to the ETS building as the State Veterans Office and Employment
Offices are located there; the relocation would facilitate customer
services for the veterans. Ms. Friedman expressed willingness
to explore this idea and would like Diana Stevens, Veteran Services
Officer, included in the decision making process.
3. Enterprise Zone Update: Mr. Wymisner reported on a committee
meeting he attended last week with Frank Bruno, City of Fort Collins
Economic Development Director, representatives from the Department
of Local Affairs, and others regarding enterprise zone amendments.
The same presentation given to the Board of County Commissioners
previously was made to the committee and they expressed many of
the same concerns as the Board regarding Enterprise Zone legislation.
Mr. Wymisner stated that the committee was informed that the
Board of County Commissioners and the Cities of Fort Collins and
Loveland are more interested in giving assistance to existing
businesses rather than recruiting new business. Mr. Wymisner
indicated that the Fort Collins Enterprise Zone will be amended,
but no decision has been made yet. Mr. Kaltenberger of the Department
of Local Affairs would like to have lunch with the Board to discuss
this matter further. Mr. Wymisner noted that the state may, through
the State Legislature, place a moratorium on amendments while
they are reviewing Enterprise Zone criteria. Mr. Wymisner also
reported on a new piece of legislation which allows for tax credits
through contributions to the Enterprise Zone, to assist the homeless
obtain jobs through specific entities. Mr. Wymisner stated he
will be meeting tomorrow with the Overall Economic Development
Planning Committee to start the transition to an advisory body
for economic development to the Board of County Commissioners.
4. Discussion of Appointment of ETS Director:
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board go into Executive
Session with Ms. Friedman to discuss a personnel matter.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
The meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m.; no action taken.
TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 1994
PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND COUNTY BUDGET
(#106 @ 2700)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 2:00 p.m. for a public
hearing to amend the county budget with Bob Keister, Budget Manager.
Chair Pro-Tem Disney presided and Commissioner Hotchkiss was
present; Chair Duvall was attending TEAM Fort Collins all day
training in Denver. Also present was Frank Lancaster, Interim
County Administrator. Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
Mr. Keister presented to the Board the Notice and Resolution to
Transfer Funds and Amend the Budget for 1994 and requested approval
and the Chair Pro-Tem's signature. Mr. Keister noted this Resolution
was published in its entirety in the newspaper and today's hearing
was duly advertised. Mr. Keister stated that all revisions in
the Resolution are items which have been previously discussed
and authorized by the Board of County Commissioners.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board adopt the Notice and
Resolution to Transfer Funds and Amend the Budget for the Calendar
Year 1994, as prepared and presented by Mr. Keister, Budget Manager,
and authorize the Chair Pro-Tem to sign same.
Motion carried 2 - 0.
R94-104g NOTICE AND RESOLUTION TO TRANSFER AND AMEND
BUDGET
The meeting adjourned at 2:15 p.m.
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24, 1994
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
(#107)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:30 a.m. in regular
session with Frank Lancaster, Interim County Administrator.
Chair Duvall presided; Commissioners Disney and Hotchkiss were
present. Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
1. WORKSESSION:
-- Mr. Lancaster submitted a tentative schedule of dates and
times for "County Seat for a Day" and requested input
from the Board, noting that the plan was to schedule one of these
meetings quarterly. After reviewing the schedule, the Board suggested
that Timnath, LaPorte/Bellvue, Poudre Park, and Pinewood Springs
also be added to the schedule; consequently, a meeting will be
scheduled every other month.
-- Mr. Lancaster informed the Board he approved a sole source
purchase for Engineering; he noted that during construction of
a bridge up north, they ran into an abandoned oil line and had
to get special assistance to resolve the problem.
-- Mr. Lancaster noted that the Board received an invitation
to attend a Chamber of Commerce Legislative Local Affairs Committee
meeting this Friday, August 26, at 8 a.m. to discuss growth issues
and planned growth in the area and he wondered if anyone would
like to go to represent the County; Commissioner Hotchkiss stated
he will attend.
-- Mr. Lancaster asked if the Board had other items to be added
to tomorrow's agenda at the Cabinet Meeting; as of now, the only
item on the agenda is discussion of the appointment of County
Administrator. Commissioner Disney indicated he would like to
discuss the Windsor annexation and Chair Duvall suggested asking
the Cabinet their opinion about the Board meeting with staff ahead
of time to discuss issues in detail regarding some of the more
complicated land use issues which come before the Board.
2. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS:
-- Commissioner Hotchkiss reported that the head feature writer
for the Denver Post, Alan Katlon, would like to do a feature story
on the growth problem in Windsor and how some communities want
to grow and some don't want to grow; Commissioner Hotchkiss stated
that Mr. Katlon will be calling Mr. Lancaster to set up a time
to meet with the Board and other interested parties to discuss
this subject.
-- Commissioner Disney noted that he, along with Rex Smith, Director
of Public Works, and Berthoud Town Administrator Anna Lanahan,
will attend a meeting this afternoon with Micki Hackenberger of
CCI to discuss the Highway 287 bypass around Berthoud.
-- Chair Duvall asked about follow-up regarding the discussion
the Board had with Hank Pedersen on Monday concerning the Board
of Adjustment; Mr. Lancaster noted he is following up on this
with staff and legal counsel.
-- Chair Duvall reported that all the interviews have been conducted
for the Planning Commission and the LaPorte Planning Advisory
Committee and she asked the Board when they would like to meet
to discuss the applicants and make the appointments; it was decided
to have this discussion when this meeting is finished.
3. DOCUMENT REVIEW: The following documents, of a routine nature,
were considered by the Board:
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board approve the Minutes
for the week of August 15, 1994 and the Agenda for the week of
August 29, 1994, as submitted.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board approve Petitions
for Abatement for the following, as recommended by the County
Assessor Steve Miller: Parker, Artisan Pattern, Thrush, Waid,
Marsh, Nelson, Madson, Hedgecock, Hall, Farris (3), Ray, Martin,
Cottonwood Estates, Steward, Major Enterprises, Chenot, and Baskins.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board approve the Larimer
County Community Corrections Department Bylaws Revision.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
LIQUOR LICENSES: Licenses were issued for the Jammer Lounge -
6% WITH EXTENDED HOURS - Loveland, CO.; and for Sparks General
Store - 3.2% - Fort Collins, CO. County approval was granted
to Larry's Southwest Liquor - 6% - Fort Collins, CO. and the Bohemian
Cottage Restaurant - 6% - Loveland, CO.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board approve the following
documents:
C94-52 CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND CONNELL RESOURCES, INC.
(Paving of CR 23 from Dixon Canyon Dam to CR 25G -
Project #149/150)
D94-27 DEED OF DEDICATION BY CARL T. SPINA AND KAREN U.
SPINA, AKA KAREN U. CUSHMAN (Spina Project #195)
Motion carried 3 - 0.
At this time, County Attorney George Hass joined the meeting for Legal Matters.
1. Liquor License Renewals: Mr. Hass discussed with the Board
in more detail his memo of August 1, 1994 regarding liquor license
renewals. The Colorado Court of Appeals recently announced that
statute does not provide sufficient standards upon which to refuse
a liquor license renewal for "good cause"; therefore,
the Board is not permitted to revisit the issue whether or not
a license should be continued at renewal time. Mr. Hass stated
that the only issue at renewal time is whether there is a technicality
or procedural reason why the license should not be renewed.
However, at any time, the Board may initiate and schedule a revocation
hearing to discuss a violation of the liquor code.
2. Discussion of Land Use Issues: With regard to questions raised
by the Board to Mr. Hass in a memo dated August 12, 1994 regarding
land use issues, Mr. Hass will research the questions in detail
and prepare a written response for the Board.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board go into Executive
Session to discuss personnel matters.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
The Board came out of Executive Session at 11:25 a.m. and took
the following action:
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board make the following appointments to the Larimer County Planning Commission: Raymond Wendell Amos and Linda Stanley, each for a four-year term ending June 30, 1998; Vern Sunset and Steve Johnson, each for a three-year term ending June 30, 1997; and Kay Carter of Berthoud and Richard Eversole as Associate Members, each for a one-year term ending June 30, 1995.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board appoint Karen Schneller
McDonald and Audrey-Lyn Stockton to the LaPorte Planning Advisory
Committee, each for a three-year term ending June 30, 1997.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
The meeting recessed at 11:25 a.m.
PLANNING WORKSESSION WITH JOHN BARNETT
(#108 & #107 @ 3800)
The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 1:30 p.m. for
a planning worksession with John Barnett, Director of Planning.
Chair Duvall presided; Commissioners Disney and Hotchkiss were
present. Also present were: Russ Legg, Senior Planner; Jill Bennett,
Comprehensive Planner; and Frank Lancaster, Interim County Administrator.
Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the creation of a Chief Planner
position in the Planning Department to handle the day-to-day logistical
details for land use and development review in an attempt to partially
alleviate the existing workload management problem; no decision
was made at this time by the Board on this matter.
Much discussion followed regarding the possibility of scheduling
a worksession on Friday mornings to discuss in detail the items
to be presented the following Monday morning during the Planning
Meeting. Commissioner Hotchkiss expressed his concern this would
result in two duplicate meetings. Mr. Legg suggested that having
a worksession with the Board might be beneficial at Concept Technical
Review, and it was recommended that the Planning Commission and
representatives from Public Works, Health and Human Services,
and the Sheriff's Department also be included in these worksessions.
It was agreed by everyone that a resolution should be formally
adopted listing criteria and goals and encompassing the Board's
policy and philosophical thinking in order for staff to have a
better understanding of what the Board's final decision will be
at the time of public hearing.
At the closing of the meeting, Chair Duvall directed Mr. Barnett
to provide a breakdown for the Board of how the $80,000 which
has been authorized for the Planning Department has been spent;
and she asked Mr. Lancaster to schedule a meeting with the Planning
Commission, Planning Staff, and the Board to discuss planning
issues at length.
The meeting adjourned at 3:40 p.m.
______________________________________
JANET S. DUVALL, CHAIR
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
( S E A L )
ATTEST:
_______________________________________
Sherry E. Graves, Deputy County Clerk
August 22, 1994