PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MONDAY, APRIL 18, 1994
SUBDIVISIONS
(#488 & #1 & #2)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:00 a.m. in regular
session with John Barnett, Director of Planning. Chair Duvall
presided; Commissioners Disney and Hotchkiss were present. Also
present were: Al Kadera, Subdivision Administrator; Jerry White,
Zoning Administrator; Rex Burns, Engineering; Jerry Blehm, Environmental
Health; and Jeannine Haag, Assistant County Attorney. Recording
Clerk, S. Graves.
Mr. Barnett stated that the following are Consent Items and will
not be discussed in detail unless requested by the Commissioners
or members of the audience.
1. SOUTH NOKOMIS LAKE SUBDIVISION AMENDED PLAT (#94-SA0448):
21-10-73; RED FEATHER LAKES; .48 ACRES; 1 LOT; O-OPEN ZONING
(04-18-94).
This is a request for an Amended Plat of Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block
26, South Nokomis Lake Subdivision to combine three lots resulting
in a single building site. Staff Findings include: 1) South
Nokomis Lake Subdivision was platted in 1924; 2) All of the lots
are non-conforming because they do not meet minimum lot size required
by zoning; 3) This request is to combine three lots and an adjacent
parcel to create one building site; 4) The County Health and Engineering
Departments and all utilities serving this area have reviewed
the proposed Amended Plat and stated no objections. Staff Recommendation
is for Approval of the Amended Plat of Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block
26, South Nokomis Lake Subdivision and a portion of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 21, Township 10 North, Range 73 West of the
6th P.M.
2. CRYSTAL LAKES 6TH FILING AMENDED PLAT (#94-SA0451):
01-10-74; CRYSTAL LAKES, WEST OF RED FEATHER LAKES;
3.12 ACRES; 1 LOT; O-OPEN ZONING (04-18-94).
This is a request for an Amended Plat of Lots 101 and 102, Crystal
Lakes, 6th Filing to combine two existing lots resulting in a
single building site. Staff Findings are: 1) Crystal Lakes 6th
Filing was approved in 1972; 2) This proposed Amended Plat is
intended to combine two existing lots into a single building site
which will reduce the overall density in the subdivision and increase
the lot size of this site; 3) The County Health and Engineering
Departments and all utilities serving this area reviewed the proposed
Amended Plat and easement vacation and stated no objections.
Staff Recommendation is for Approval of the Amended Plat of Lots
101 and 102, Crystal Lakes 6th Filing.
3. NORTH LINCOLN STREET NAME CHANGE (#94-OSO452):
36-06-69; LINCOLN AVENUE, NORTH OF KNOBCONE DRIVE;
FA-FARMING ZONING (04-18-94).
This is a request for a street name change from Lincoln Avenue
to Sunvalley Drive. Staff Findings include: 1) North Lincoln,
through Northwoods Park, was named when there were no other roads
in this part of North Loveland; 2) Additional development has
resulted in a discontinuation of North Lincoln Avenue at Knobcone
Drive. Lincoln, north of Knobcone, is actually an extension of
Sunvalley Drive; 3) The County Engineer, the Loveland Fire Department,
and all utilities serving this area have reviewed the proposed
street name and stated no objections. Staff Recommendation is
for Approval of the street name change of North Lincoln Avenue
to Sunvalley Drive, north of Knobcone Drive.
4. BLUE MOUNTAIN RANCH STREET NAME REQUEST (#94-OSO449):
17 AND 18-04-70, WEST OF CARTER LAKE; O-OPEN ZONING (04-18-94)
This is a street name request to name three unnamed roads. Staff
Findings are: 1) Road names are required to assign addresses for
utility, building permit and emergency service purposes; 2) The
proposed road names were reviewed by the Sheriff, utility providers
and the fire district and no objections were identified. Staff
Recommendation is for Approval of the road names requested for
the Blue Mountain Ranch Area; these names are Blue Mountain Trail,
Dry Creek Drive, and Elk Run.
5. MILL CREEK ROAD ASSOCIATION STREET NAME REQUEST
(#94-OSO450): 3, 5, 9, 15-11-72 AND S 1/2 31 AND 33-12-72; NORTH
OF CHEROKEE PARK ROAD, EAST OF MONUMENT GULCH;
O-OPEN ZONING (04-18-94)
This is a street name request to name several unnamed roads.
Staff Findings include: 1) The Mill Creek Road Association serves
an area of 35-acre parcels north of Cherokee Park Road; roads
in this area have never been named; 2) Road names are important
for utility service, building permits and emergency response;
3) The proposed road names have been reviewed by the County Engineer
and all utilities serving this area and no objections were stated;
4) The proposed road names do not appear to duplicate any existing
road names in the immediate area. Staff Recommendation is for
Approval of the road names proposed by the Mill Creek Road Association,
as shown on the attached map.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board adopt the Staff Findings
and Staff Recommendations and approve the South Nokomis Lake Subdivision
Amended Plat (#94-SA0448); Crystal Lakes 6th Filing Amended Plat
(#94-SA0451); North Lincoln Street Name Change (#94-0S0452); Blue
Mountain Ranch Street Name Request (#94-OSO449); and the Mill
Creek Road Association Street Name Request (#94-OSO45O).
Motion carried 3 - 0.
6. SPRAGUE SPECIAL REVIEW (#94-ZR0393): 35-06-70; WEST SIDE OF
COUNTY ROAD 27, TWO MILES NORTH OF U.S. HIGHWAY 34;
19 ACRES (SITE E) & 40 ACRES (SITE K); 2 LOTS; FA-1 FARMING
ZONING (04-18-94).
This is a request to allow construction of a building for stone
sawing and processing, and maintenance of quarry equipment, and
addition of a dwelling. Mr. White noted that this request is
for an amendment to an existing Special Review approved in 1986;
Mr. White provided the project description and reviewed the major
concerns and issues, one of which is the impact on the roads due
to increased truck traffic. Mr. Burns noted that the impact of
the additional traffic on the roads is determined by estimating
the additional truck loads and equating that to the cost of constructing
the road over a 20-year design life. Staff Findings are: 1) The
proposal generally complies with the intent and purposes of the
Zoning Resolution and County Land Use Plan; 2) If developed and
operated properly, the proposed use will have little or no impact
on surrounding land uses or on property values in the area; 3)
The proposal will not impair the public health, welfare, prosperity,
or safety.
Ms. Sprague, applicant and property owner, addressed the Board
and stated that there will be very little increased impact on
the roads because 75% of the blocks will be brought from on-site
and most of the sales go out in pickups and small loads; she also
discussed the condition requiring the doors to remain closed
during operation of the stone process and requested this condition
be abated to allow them to leave the doors open in the summer
to make it more comfortable for the employees, unless there is
a complaint about the noise. Ms. Sprague also requested they
be allowed to have a 2nd shift of operations--from 6 a.m. until
2 p.m. and 2 p.m. until 10 p.m.; the current hours of operation
are 7 a.m. until 5 p.m. Several neighbors and adjacent property
owners addressed the Board and cited their concerns of increased
noise, inadequate water supply and quality, increased truck traffic,
lack of enforcement of existing conditions, and voiced their disapproval
of extending hours of operation and allowing the doors to remain
open in the new building during hours of operation, etc. Mr.
Blehm responded that the water is routinely tested and has always
been acceptable and when the noise level is checked it also is
within acceptable State standards.
After lengthy discussion, the Planning Commission/Staff Recommendation
for Approval of the Special Review conditions were amended as
follows: 1) This proposal does not expand any mining area which
has been previously approved by the County, or alter any conditions
applied to those plans; 2) Locations for the quarry building and
the residence shall be the northern-most alternative. The metal
building shall be situated as far to the west as possible; it
shall be painted a color similar to the natural features in the
area, and have no white or reflective exterior surfaces. It shall
be insulated for noise mitigation. Doors should remain closed,
except for entry and exist of vehicles, especially during operation
of stone process; 3) The area around the shop building shall not
be used as a salvage yard or storage area for unused equipment.
No quarry-related equipment or materials shall be maintained
near the residence; 4) No signs or public access shall be allowed
to the shop building. Within 30 days, a lighting plan shall be
provided for Planning Department approval, showing that lighting
is adequately shielded; 5) All equipment repair shall occur between
the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.; 6) Underground utilities are required;
7) Applicant shall comply with all requirements of Arkins Water
Association, County Forester, and County Engineering Department,
as presented on pages 24-28 of the Staff Report; 8) Except as
otherwise modified by the above conditions, all development and
use of the site shall be consistent with Zoning File Exhibit A
(Application for Zoning Action, dated January 10, 1994, with attached
information; 9) A road impact fee will be imposed relating to
additional load increase on the County roads; 10) On-site water
tanks will be filled during off hours or non-peak hours to alleviate
an imposition on domestic water use; 11) The owners and neighbors
will cooperate in determining the background noise level for the
existing operation and a pre-determined time will be established
to do noise measurements with the new equipment; 12) The electric
saw and electric crane, with a maximum of ten tons, must be operated
inside the building, which is to be insulated for noise mitigation;
13) Because of the unique topography and amphitheater nature of
the area, a performance standard on noise with the new equipment
will be established; 14) A berm will be created to the east of
the proposed building to further increase noise and screen mitigation.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board adopt the Staff Findings
and Staff/Planning Commission Recommendation and approve the Sprague
Special Review (#94-ZR0393), with conditions as outlined.
Motion carried 2 - 1; Chair Duvall dissented.
The meeting recessed at 10:50 a.m.
MEETING WITH SHERIFF SHOCKLEY
(#2 @ 300)
The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 1:30 p.m. in regular
session with Sheriff Shockley. Chair Duvall presided; Commissioners
Disney and Hotchkiss were present. Also present were Bob Keister,
Budget Manager, and Bill Gordon, County Administrator. Recording
Clerk, S. Graves.
Sheriff Shockley stated that the purpose of today's meeting is to discuss the dominating issues existing in the Sheriff's Department and to describe the realistic dilemma for continuing to provide services at the current level with the rate of growth the County is experiencing. Sheriff Shockley noted that response times to emergency and non-emergency calls have increased and stated that E911 has greatly impacted the Sheriff's Department. Sheriff Shockley reviewed several options for the Board to consider to solve this dilemma 1) Reduce services at current staffing levels; 2) Establish a LEA (Law Enforcement Agency); 3) Privatizing the civil process; 4) Imposition of impact fees from expansion of existing subdivisions and new subdivisions to cover cost of services. There was discussion of doing a cost/benefit analysis of growth; however, it was noted that this could take a long time; in the interim, the Board requested Mr. Keister to assemble cost/reality figures of additional growth and revenue enhancement.
There was discussion of placing an initiative for establishing
a LEA on the ballot in November; the Board agreed to schedule
another meeting with the Sheriff to discuss this possibility further.
The meeting adjourned at 2:30 p.m.
TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 1994
PUBLIC WORKS STANDING MEETING
(#3)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:00 a.m. in regular
session with Rex Smith, Director of Public Works. Chair Pro-Tem
presided; Commissioner Hotchkiss was present. Also present were:
John MacFarlane, Director of Parks; Frank Lancaster, Director
of Natural Resources; and Bill Gordon, County Administrator.
Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
1. Budget Revision for Enhancement Parks Project: Mr. MacFarlane requested Board authorization to include $180,000 in the Parks Department Budget to reflect the costs for the Timberline Road Project for bike lanes (Fort Collins - $12,745; County Road & Bridge - $12,745; County Parks - $25,490; and ISTEA - $129,000). Mr. MacFarlane noted that the ISTEA grant for these funds has been signed and returned; however, the project will be completed before these Federal grant dollars will be received. As these funds are received from these entities, they will be credited back to the Parks Department.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board authorize the inclusion
of $180,000 in the 1994 Parks Department Budget to reflect combined
monies to be received from ISTEA, Road & Bridge, Fort Collins
and Parks for the Timberline Road Project to build 6-foot bike
lanes from Trilby Road south 3.25 miles to 57th Street.
Motion carried 2 - 0.
2. Proposed Agreement with Sheriff's Department and Parks Department:
With regard to the new policy mandated by the State six months
ago concerning Park Rangers having to be employees of the Sheriff
in order to enforce the laws of the Park (these employees to be
supervised by the Parks Director), Mr. MacFarlane submitted a
proposed joint agreement for the Board's review regarding this
new mandate. Mr. MacFarlane noted that this agreement has also
been sent to the County Attorney and the Sheriff and the County
Attorney advised that the agreement be made between the Board
and the Sheriff; he will return to the Board in approximately
one month for final approval of the agreement and the Chair's
signature.
3. County Roads 19 & 38E Intersection Improvement Project:
Mr. Smith informed the Board that the CR 19 and 38E intersection
improvement project has an estimated budget of $230,000 - $184,000
in Federal funds and $46,000 in County funds; it was estimated
that the $46,000 would be derived from Road Impact Fees collected
for new development in the area. Mr. Smith noted that presently
there is an uncommitted balance of $23,000 in Road Impact Fees;
however, with the waiver of the fees for Springfield Court Apartments,
there is no firm funding source for the remaining $23,000. Mr.
Smith requested direction from the Board and offered two options:
1) Drop the project; 2) Identify additional funding from another
source. Mr. Smith noted that the City of Fort Collins will administer
this project, as it will ultimately become a City intersection,
and he needs to advise the City whether funding will be forthcoming
from the County for them to proceed with the project.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board authorize the expenditure
of $23,000 from the 1993 Road and Bridge Carry Over for the County
Road 19 and 38E Intersection Upgrading and Signalization Project.
Motion carried 2 - 0.
4. Larimer County Application for 1995 State Special Bridge Funds:
Mr. Smith submitted a cover letter to accompany the Application
for 1995 State Special Bridge Fund Monies, and requested the Board's
approval and the Chair's signature. Mr. Smith noted there were
five candidates identified for these monies.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board approve the Application
for 1995 State Special Bridge Funds, and authorize the Chair to
sign the Cover Letter accompanying the Application.
Motion carried 2 - 0.
5. Transit Development Plan: Mr. Smith has talked to Estes Park
about participating in the Transit Development Plan and they are
not interested as they are doing their own transit plan. Originally
Mr. Smith thought the study was a 80-20 match, with the County's
share being $5,000; but he has been informed it is a 70-30 match,
making the County's share $7,500. Mr. Smith asked if the Board
is still interested in participating in this study if Estes Park
is not involved. Commissioner Disney will be in Estes Park on
Thursday and talk to the Town Officials about this matter further;
in the meantime, the Board decided to take the following action:
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board approve the increase
in funding, from $5,000 to $7,500) for the County's share in developing
a Transit Development Plan; monies to be derived from the 1993
Carry Over.
Motion carried 2 - 0.
At this time, Chair Duvall joined the meeting.
6. Landfill Fee Waiver Policy - Natural Resources: Mr. Lancaster
reviewed the history for landfill fee waivers, noting that in
1983 there were over 50 individuals and groups who didn't pay
for coming into the landfill, and it was quite costly. At that
time, they instituted a new policy of discontinuing these waivers
and currently there are only three groups that don't pay fees
at the landfill. However, they are getting more and more requests
for fee waivers and Mr. Lancaster asked the Board how they want
him to handle these requests. Mr. Lancaster recommended not changing
the fee waiver policy at the landfill that only the Board of
County Commissioners can decide if a fee waiver is to be allowed.
CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD was to continue with the fee waiver policy
as it currently is and only in emergency cases they will allow
an exception to the rule.
7. "City Haul" - Natural Resources: Mr. Lancaster
described a new proposal for resale of reusable items at the
landfill and requested Board approval of same. Mr. Lancaster
outlined the objectives, advantages and disadvantages of the proposal
and noted that a small area will be fenced off for the resale
of reusable items; sale of materials will cover all costs and
possibly result in a return to the Solid Waste Fund. Labor will
be provided by one temporary employee, community service workers,
and a team of at-risk youth through ETS. Mr. Lancaster stated
that inventory control will be very tight and they will have request
forms for individuals looking for certain items. The program
would be a pilot program for the summer of 1994 and the success
and continuation of "City Haul" will be evaluated in
November 1994. CONSENSUS OF THE BOARD was to approve the waiver
of County policy for disposition of County property to allow the
sale of landfill items and low-value County property items to
the general public at "City Haul". The Board directed
Mr. Lancaster to work with the Purchasing Department and the County
Attorney to draft an agreement for the Board to sign regarding
this proposal.
8. "No Trucks" Signage: Mr. Smith informed the Board
that he received an opinion back from the County Attorney regarding
the County's authority to sign residential streets in the LaPorte
area for "No Trucks"; this is an area where trucks are
using non-County maintained residential streets for access in
and out of the commercial area. Mr. Smith noted that this action
will require the Board to pass a Resolution and when one is drafted,
he will return for adoption and signature. Mr. Smith also has
had a request from the State Patrol to sign Overland Trail as
"No Commercial Vehicle Thru Traffic".
9. Report on Drainage Problem: Mr. Smith reported he met with
the property owners in the Lake Shore Gardens Subdivision regarding
their storm drainage problem and they are attempting to resolve
the problem.
10. Memo Regarding Policy on Participation in Road Upgrades:
Mr. Smith sent a Memo to the Board regarding policy on County
participation in road upgrades and storm drainage problems; discussion
of this matter will be held during another meeting scheduled with
the Board.
11. Request for progress report on "Killer" Intersection:
Chair Duvall reported that several months ago she toured the "Killer"
intersection of the old Highway 287 and the new Bypass with LaPorte
resident Harvey Kittle and Rex Burns to try to resolve how this
intersection could be made safe. At that time, Mr. Burns suggested
putting up cones to direct the traffic and he stated he would
write a letter to the State for suggestions and guidance. Chair
Duvall asked Mr. Smith if the State has responded and if anything
is being considered to alleviate this dangerous situation. Mr.
Smith will request Mr. Burns write a letter to the State for the
Board to sign regarding this matter.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board go into Executive Session
to discuss contract negotiations.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
The meeting adjourned at 11:00 a.m.; no action taken.
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 20, 1994
ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS
(#4 & #5)
The Board of County Commissioners met at 9:30 a.m. in regular
session with Bill Gordon, County Administrator. Chair Duvall
presided; Commissioners Disney and Hotchkiss were present. Also
present were: Stu VanMeveren, District Attorney; Drew Davis, Sheriff's
Department Research Technician; Dr. Larry Johnston, Director Environmental
Health; Mark Johnson, EMS Coordinator; and Jerry White, Zoning
Administrator. Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
1. PRESENTATION OF THE PROCLAMATION FOR CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS
WEEK - APRIL 24-30, 1994: Mr. VanMeveren stated that as a society
we can't ignore the plight of crime victims and the reason for
the week is to recognize their plight. Chair Duvall read the
Proclamation aloud and presented same to the District Attorney.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board of County Commissioners
proclaim the week of April 24 - 30, 1994 as Crime Victims' Rights
Week, reaffirming its commitment to address victims' rights and
criminal justice issues during 1994 and throughout the year, and
authorize the Chair to sign the Proclamation.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
2. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF VICTIMS OF CRIME ASSISTANCE FUNDS:
Mr. Davis requested Board approval of a grant application for
Victims of Crime Assistant Funds; these funds will be used to
fund the second part of their Victims Assistance Program and to
hire a full-time Victims Assistance Coordinator and will not replace
any of the existing services, such as Crossroads, etc. Mr. Davis
noted that these funds are Federal dollars and no County dollars
are required, only in-kind services in the Sheriff's Department
and VALE grant monies.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board approve the Victims of
Crime Assistant Funds grant application to fund the six-month
salary for a Victims Assistance Coordinator, as requested by Mr.
Davis.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
3. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE EMS GRANT PRIORITIES: Dr. Johnston
and Mr. Johnson presented the recommended prioritization list
of the grant applications of the Larimer County EMS Agencies and
requested Board approval and the Chair's signature on a letter
of support for this priority ranking. Dr. Johnston reviewed
the success of this program over the last three years and noted
that over one-half million dollars has been received in that time
to supplement EMS services in smaller communities; Dr. Johnston
noted that when the final decision is made for these grant awards,
the letter of recommendation from the Board of County Commissioners
is very important in the final selection. Dr. Johnston stated
that last year every grant that was submitted was funded and is
well spent to improve services delivered by EMS agencies. Mr.
Johnson stated that the grant money received is used to fund projects
and to encourage agencies to look at long-term planning and set
realistic goals. Mr. Johnson noted that every year there is
approximately 2 1/2 million dollars available to agencies across
the State from EMS Grant Funds, which is derived from $1 per license
plate sold in Colorado. Mr. Johnson informed the Board that
this program will expire in 1996, unless it is renewed by a vote
of the public.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board approve the EMS Emergency
Medical Services Grant Priorities List, as presented by Dr. Johnston
and Mr. Johnson, and authorize the Chair to sign the letters of
recommendation when presented in final form.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
4. BRIEFING ON MINERAL RIGHTS: Mr. White requested the Board to approve and the Chair sign Division Orders certifying that the County is the lawful owner of the mineral rights on a piece of property south of Loveland. Mr. White noted that by signing the Division Orders, the County will receive $25 to $50 annually for their mineral rights.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board authorize the Chair to
sign the Division Orders ratifying that the County is the lawful
owner of mineral rights on property south of Loveland, as requested
by Mr. White.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
5. WORKSESSION:
-- Mr. Gordon noted that Dr. Keith Olson, Director of Mental Health, sent a memo to the Board requesting approval and the Chair's signature on a Personnel Authorization Request Form to hire a full-time Mental Health Therapist I for the Child and Family Team. Mr. Gordon stated that the Therapist will spend one-half of their time on the "Cities in Schools" Project.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Hotchkiss moved that the Board approve the request
from the Mental Health Director to add one full-time employee,
a Mental Health Therapist I, to implement the "Cities in
Schools" Project, and authorize the Chair to sign the Personnel
Authorization Request.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
-- Mr. Gordon informed the Board that a letter was received
from Berthoud requesting participation in the funding of their
library. Mr. Gordon noted this request will be considered, along
with other requests, at the Public Hearing for Impact Assistance
Grants on May 17, 1994; and at that time, the Board will be asked
to prioritize requests for funding.
7. DOCUMENT REVIEW: The following documents, of a routine nature,
were considered by the Board:
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board approve the Minutes for
the week of April 11, 1994, and the Agenda for the week of April
25, 1994, as submitted.
Motion carried 3- 0.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board approve Petitions for
Abatement, as recommended by the County Assessor Steve Miller,
for the following: SMI Creations; Apropo, Inc.; PM Group Life
Insurance; Scavo; Tiley; Stover; and Pederson.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board approve the following
miscellaneous documents: Deer Trails 1 Minor Residential Development
(#S-50-91) Plat; Highland Hills Planned Unit Development Phase
I Plat; and an Amended Hall Exemption.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
LIQUOR LICENSES: Licenses were issued to Al Fresco Great Italian
Food - 6% WITH EXTENDED HOURS - Fort Collins, CO.; The Dunraven
Inn - 6% - Estes Park, CO.; Dark Horse Restaurant - 6% WITH EXTENDED
HOURS - Estes Park, CO.; and Overland Foods - 3.2% - LaPorte,
CO. County Approval was granted to Potbelly Restaurant and
Lounge - 6% - Red Feather Lakes, CO.; Fort Namaqua Wine &
Spirits - 6% - Loveland, CO.; Rainbow Plaza, Inc. - 6% - Loveland,
CO.; Mountain Greenery Resort - 6% - Bellvue, CO.; The Inn of
Glen Haven - 6% - Glen Haven, CO.; Tagliamonti Associates, Inc.,
- REQUEST TO CHANGE TRADE NAME to Fort Collins Plaza Inn (Old
Trade Name - Ramada Inn) - 6% - 3709 E. Mulberry Street, Fort
Collins, CO.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board approve the following
documents:
A94-70 EXTENSION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR WEATHERIZATION
SERVICES BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY
OF COLORADO
A94-71 LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND THE STATE OF COLORADO,
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT (Fort Collins
Job Service Center)
C94-22 CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. (Contract #94C0369 - GIS
User Community & Representatives of External
Organizations)
D94-14 DEED OF DEDICATION BY REINHOLT J. SCHNEIDER
(Dedication of Property for Public Highway - Project
#180)
R94-44s FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION DENYING THE PRELIMINARY
PLAT OF CASHMERE DOWNS SUBDIVISION
R94-45s FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY
PLAT OF CIMARRON LAKE SUBDIVISION
Motion carried 3 - 0.
At this time, County Attorney George Hass; Jeannine Haag, Assistant County Attorney; Rex Smith, Director of Public Works; Russ Legg, Development Processing Administrator; and John Pedas, Code Enforcement Officer, joined the meeting for Legal Matters.
1. "Logan Dump" Cleanup: Ms. Haag reported that a
court order has been received allowing the County to clean up
the "Logan Dump" within a certain period of time. Ms.
Haag requested direction from the Board whether the cleanup should
be put out for bid to a private company or the County do it; she
is concerned about litigation afterwards and recommended keeping
the cleanup internal. Mr. Pedas noted there are 60 to 90 cubic
yards of trash; Mr. Smith stated that Road and Bridge is working
4 - 10's and could do it on a Friday on an overtime basis and
not impact their workload; however, he would like to have the
dump fees waived or paid by someone other than Road & Bridge
and requested having deputy coverage. After discussion, the Board
recommended going out to a private contractor for the cleanup
and if they are subsequently sued, the County will represent them
if the suit is within the scope of the cleanup.
2. Consideration of Options for Accessing Information: Ms.
Haag stated that she and the Planning Department have been discussing
various options for the Board to consider for accessing information
before public hearings. Ms. Haag described the Federal Model
whereby for large complex issues the Board would hold a pre-hearing,
take the matter under advisement for a certain period of time
in which the public can submit written comments, and then hold
a second hearing and a decision is made. Mr. Legg stated they
would have to change their regulations to define large complex.
Or, the Board can continue with the present method and may take
the matter under advisement and no further evidence or testimony
is taken. Ms. Haag stated there are problems with getting too
much information ahead of time because the Board is not to go
into a judicial hearing with pre-conceived ideas about the matter.
Mr. Hass stated that the Board has the authority right now to
adopt the Federal Model or can opt to close the public hearing,
except for a single issue, and will only accept additional information
for their consideration on that issue, and table the decision
until later. Commissioners Hotchkiss and Disney expressed their
desire to continue with the present method of conducting public
hearings and obtaining information. Mr. Legg stated that Planning
has requested the Engineering and Health Departments to include
more information in their packets before public hearings. The
Board agreed they are going to ask for and require more information
during public hearings in the future before making final decisions.
3. Estes Park Lodging Tax: Ms. Haag informed the Board that
Estes Park is considering asking the County to adopt a lodging
tax up to 2% to be used for advertising and promoting tourism
in their area. Discussion ensued regarding if a geographical
area is designated for imposition of the tax, who will vote on
the tax - will be a County-wide vote or just an area vote? The
implications of Amendment #1 and HB 1286 were discussed; Mr. Hass
will research this Bill and report back to the Board with this
findings.
4. Report on Oregon Case: Mr. Hass reported on a case in Oregon in which a hardware store owner wanted to expand his business and the City conditioned approval of the expansion on the owner dedicating an area for a bikeway and open space. The case went to the Supreme Court, as it was an "unreasonable taking". Mr. Hass noted that the law in Colorado is if it was a street for cars, there would be no problem as expansion of a business increases traffic.
M O T I O N
Commissioner Disney moved that the Board go into Executive Session
to discuss a Legal Matter.
Motion carried 3 - 0.
The meeting recessed at 11:25 a.m.; no action taken.
STANDING PLANNING WORKSESSION WITH JOHN BARNETT
(#5 & #6)
The Board of County Commissioners reconvened at 1:30 p.m. for
a worksession with John Barnett, Director of Planning. Chair
Duvall presided; Commissioners Disney and Hotchkiss were present.
Also present were Jerry White, Zoning Administrator, and Bill
Gordon, County Administrator. Recording Clerk, S. Graves.
1. Piedmont Farms Housing Problem: Mr. White reported on the
status of the migrant housing problem at Piedmont Farms; he described
all the avenues which have been considered over the past two years
to obtain approval for various types of housing on this site.
Two days ago, Mr. White was informed by a representative from
Piedmont Farms that they would like to move some migrant housing
buildings over from Boulder County; these buildings must be moved
within sixty days or will be demolished. Discussion of the many
technical problems followed; the Board suggested that Human Development
should be involved and directed Mr. Barnett to process the request
as an exception with the Board of Adjustment and work on the impacts
of the Special Review. The Board agreed that these buildings
will help alleviate the affordable housing problem, but they cannot
look the other way and just let it happen.
2. Second Installment Report on Special Projects and Research
Work Plans: Mr. Barnett presented the second installment of a
workplan relating to the following special projects: Development
Fee Structure Revisions; Revisiting the Urban Growth Areas and
IGA's; and the North Lake Plan. Mr. Barnett submitted for the
Board's review a report on the status of each of the special projects,
a date on which the effort is projected to be completed, and a
detailed work program of the work in progress.
With regard to the development fee structure revisions, Mr. Barnett noted they are working on the administrative and application fees; Bob Keister, Budget Manager, is interviewing the Front Range Counties and Larimer County Municipalities and will have a report for the Board to consider in August. Mr. Barnett asked if the Board thinks impact fees should also be included in this report; the Board directed Mr. Barnett to continue working on the administrative fees first. Mr. Barnett informed the Board that the Resolution on School Impact Fees is in the County Attorney's Office, as proposed by the Thompson R2J School District.
With regard to the Board responding to the Northeast Area Neighborhood
Coalition, the Board agreed to tell them that their concerns have
been heard and understood by the Board and in their day-by-day
judgments on land-use planning, the Board will be very sensitive
to their concerns and will do their very best to help protect
them. Commissioner Disney recommended a consultant be engaged
to work on their problem; and it was suggested that the Coalition
be asked to financially participate in the hiring of this consultant.
As the Board had scheduled interviews at this time, it was decided
to continue with the Standing Planning Worksession on Monday,
April 25, 1994.
The meeting adjourned at 2:35 p.m.
_______________________________________
JANET S. DUVALL, CHAIR
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
( S E A L )
ATTEST:
________________________________________
Sherry E. Graves, Deputy County Clerk